Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
NTW

Nuclear Transparency Watch

NGO · France · EU Transparency Register 662425018879-32

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 964 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #526 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • NTW also follows the EU measures concerning the cooperation with other countries and international organisations. In…
  • The International Convention on Nuclear Safety
  • The Aarhus Convention
  • The Espoo Convention

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Paris, France

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Nuclear in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Nuclear Transparency Watch? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Nuclear Transparency Watch engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Nuclear Transparency Watch or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Nuclear Transparency Watch filed 2 positions between 3 Apr 2020 and 26 Nov 2025, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2020 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed

What they argued

EU taxonomy - Review of the environmental delegated actfiled 26 Nov 2025PDFsource

Nuclear Transparency Watch calls on the European Commission to: 1 - Exclude nuclear energy from the EU Taxonomy due to its unsustainable and high-risk nature. 2 - Strengthen transparency by requiring verifiable, science-based evidence for all technical screening criteria. 3 - Enforce compliance with EU and Euratom laws on nuclear safety, waste management, and public participation.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Nuclear Transparency Watch next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 11.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Nuclear Transparency Watch’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.