Nuclear Transparency Watch calls on the European Commission to: 1 - Exclude nuclear energy from the EU Taxonomy due to its unsustainable and high-risk nature. 2 - Strengthen transparency by requiring verifiable, science-based evidence for all technical screening criteria. 3 - Enforce compliance with EU and Euratom laws on nuclear safety, waste management, and public participation.
Nuclear Transparency Watch
NGO · France · EU Transparency Register 662425018879-32
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 964 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #526 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- NTW also follows the EU measures concerning the cooperation with other countries and international organisations. In…
- The International Convention on Nuclear Safety
- The Aarhus Convention
- The Espoo Convention
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Paris, France
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Nuclear in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Nuclear Transparency Watch? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Nuclear Transparency Watch filed 2 positions between 3 Apr 2020 and 26 Nov 2025, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
Nuclear Transparency Watch is a European network of NGOs whose goal is to increase nuclear safety by supporting access to justice and access to information. NTW welcomes the Commission’s efforts to address the findings of EU non-compliance with the Convention by amending the Regulation with suitable measures.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Nuclear Transparency Watch next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 11.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Nuclear Transparency Watch’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.