Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
LBI

Lipu-BirdLife Italy

NGO · Italy · EU Transparency Register 27693284220-05

3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #470 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.1
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2010
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • BirdLife International partner
  • https://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/our-partners/
  • IUCN member
  • https://www.iucn.org/our-union/members/members-directory?mbr_cgry=All&rgn=All&stat=1386&page=1
  • FSC
  • https://it.fsc.org/it-it
  • CIPRA
  • https://www.cipra.org/it/chi-siamo/membri

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
Lipu Odv (Lipu-Birdlife Italia)
Head office
Parma, Italy

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Lipu-BirdLife in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Lipu-BirdLife Italy

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Lipu-BirdLife Italy? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Lipu-BirdLife Italy filed 3 positions between 3 Apr 2020 and 31 Mar 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.

2020 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Guidance on the application of the ‘do no significant harm’ principle under the 2028-2034 MFFfiled 31 Mar 2026source

Compliance with the DNSH principle in the next MFF can be assessed in two simple steps. Firstly, the activities should be compared with two lists: an exclusion list (significant damage, no EU funding) and an eligibility list (no expected environmental impact). If an activity is present in one of the two lists, it is automatically compliant or non-compliant and the assessment is concluded.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Conventionfiled 3 Apr 2020source

Dear Madame/Sir, As an organisation working on protecting the environment we know about the importance of access to justice for ensuring compliance with EU law and to address the ecological crisis, both at Member State and EU level. We therefore very much welcome the European Commission consultation on the Roadmap. We’d like to stress the following points: A.

Amending certain CAP Regulations as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports, data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties (Omnibus III)filed 31 Jul 2025source

While we agree with the need to simplify the bureaucracy that underpins the requirements of the CAP at both institutional and recipient level, we believe that this should not coincide with weakening environmental and social ambitions.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Lipu-BirdLife Italy next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 14.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Lipu-BirdLife Italy’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.