Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2022/0089(COD) · In Force

Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products

61 submissions from 56 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 394 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 61 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee AGRIRapporteur Paolo De Castro (S&D)
  1. Published in the Official Journal · 23 Apr 2024
  2. Signed · 11 Apr 2024
  3. Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 26 Mar 2024
  4. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 13 Mar 2024
  5. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 11 Mar 2024

Who showed up

24 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 24 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 24Civil society 24Public authorities, academia, other 13

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

21 of 56
in the EU Register
75
full-time lobbying staff
€2.6M+
declared costs a year
54
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 28 Jun 2022 — it ran from 3 Apr 2022.

Policy area
Agriculture (DG AGRI)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
AGRI
Commission reference
COM(2022)134

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep25 Nov 2020
  2. Public consultation9 Apr 2021
  3. Proposal for a regulation28 Jun 2022

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 61 submissions.

U

UNIFAB

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

Introductory words Unifab is very thankful for the opportunity given by the European Commission and especially DG AGRI to share its views and inputs regarding the revision of the EU geographical indications scheme. This revision is eagerly awaited for a large part of the French and European members of our association, that are particularly involved into the protection and promotion of geographical indications.

LinkedInX
CC

Comité Champagne (CIVC)

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

The Champagne Committee has taken note of the proposal for a regulation on geographical indications of the European Union for wines, spirit drinks and agricultural products published on 31 March and points to a number of points of interest for the protection of geographical indications.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
I

IRQUALIM

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

IRQUALIM, the Regional Institute for Food Quality in Occitanie, brings together all regional actors involved in a sector under Quality and Origin Identification Signs — SIQO- (PDO/AOC, PGI, Red Label, Biological Agriculture). The Occitanie region has 250 products under SIQO, the 1st organic region of France and the 1st world vineyard area for PDO and PGI wines.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
C

CEVI

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

The European Confederation of Independent Winegrowers (CEVI) represents and defends the interests of the European Independent Winegrowers. They grow their own vine and produce themselves their wine, and in most cases run family businesses. They directly sell the fruits of their labour to the consumers, and actively contribute to the development of the entrepreneurial fabric of the internal market.

LinkedInX
CN

Confederazione Nazionale Coldiretti

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

With the proposed reform of the EU Geographical Indications (GIs) system, presented on the 31st March 2022, the European Commission intends to pursue two general objectives, as stated in the Introductory Report to the proposal: 1) strengthening the GIs’ protection system by ensuring effective protection of intellectual property rights in the Union, including harmonized and efficient registration procedures, in order…

LinkedInX
CP

Consorzio per la Tutela del Formaggio Pecorino Romano

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

Please find attached the position of the Consorzio per la Tutela del formaggio Pecorino Romano, in particular the points to be improved in the revision of the GI scheme, in our opinion, should be as follows: (1) making better use of the framework in which the Groups operate; (2) regulation and harmonisation of the nature, structure and functions of the Groups at EU level; (3) identification of a European Agency for…

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

A position paper from the Association of Producers of Bananas Producers in the Canary Islands (ASPROCAN), the Management Body for the Canary Islands Plátano PGI, can be found in the attached file on the proposal put forward by the European Commission for the reform of the EU Geographical Indications system.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
BN

Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac (BNIC)

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

Hello, Please find attached the contribution of the Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac (BNIC). We would like to thank you in advance for your interest in our comments and we remain at your disposal to further elaborate on the various topics covered in this document. Very cordially.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

In the attached file, an opinion on the consultation procedure “EU rules for geographical indications (revision)” of the “Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft — Institut für Lebensmittelwirtschaft und Markt”, the “Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft — Institut für Lebensmittelwirtschaft und Markt”, responsible for producer controls in the Federal State of Bavaria (Germany).

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

The Spanish Association of Designations of Origin — ORIGEN ESPAÑA welcomes the Commission’s initiative to review the policy governing European Union quality schemes (PDO and PGI). We strongly believe that this revision is crucial to strengthen the EU’s quality policy and maximise the potential of geographical indications (GIs), as well as its contribution to the European Farm to Fork Strategy (F2F).

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CD

Consorzio di Tutela Olio Seggiano DOP

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

Comment on: Food and beverages — EU geographical indications scheme (revision) on the provision of food information to consumers. Contribution to the public consultation The Consorzio di Tutela Olio Seggiano PDO was created in 2002 under the influence of a group of amateur entrepreneurs linked to the production of extra virgin olive oil resulting from the processing of olives from the local cultivar, the Olivastra…

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
QQ

QUORE - Qualità e Origine Rete TOSCANA DOP e IGP

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

Quality and Origine Rete TOSCANA PDO and PGI, briefly QUORE, is an association set up in March 2022 with the aim of bringing together producers of PDOs and PGIs produced in Tuscany with the aim of sharing objectives, strategies and activities. In this initial phase, nine associations have joined, representing as many products, especially small products that take place in mountains or hills.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AC

Austrian Chamber of Agriculture

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

The draft legal text which lies on the table is the outcome of a long-lasting process led by the Commission and pro-actively accompanied by many stakeholders like Copa-Cogeca to which the Austrian Chamber of Agriculture is a member.

LinkedInX
CC

Copa-Cogeca

· · filed 28 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

1. Delegation of power to EUIPO Copa and Cogeca believe that shifting competencies away from DG AGRI and towards an agency specialised in intellectual property rights and without the necessary knowledge of the specificities of the agricultural sector and the nature of GIs puts at risk this successful policy.

LinkedInX
ED

European Dairy Association (EDA)

· · filed 27 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

The European dairy is the guardian of a unique culinary heritage and a cultural treasure: next to the legal protection of dairy terms, like ‘milk’, ‘cheese’ or ‘whey’ more than 300 designations of cheeses and other dairy products are protected as Geographical Indications (GI) through the EU quality policy and the GI protection scheme.

LinkedInX

oriGIn EU is the European branch of the global alliance of GIs (https://www.origin-gi.com ). Its mission is to ensure better protection and promotion of GIs. oriGIn EU represents individual European GIs groups as well as national GIs organisations. The positive role played by the EU food quality scheme, and in particular GIs is widely demonstrated at producers, consumers, and society’s levels.

LinkedInX
CD

Confédération des vins IGP de France

· · filed 27 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

The Confédération des vins IGP de France represents and defends the interests of French wine producers with a Protected Geographical Indication and the organisations responsible for these PGIs. In the attached document we return to more detail on several points: producer groups, sustainability, the role of EUIPO, control of wine GIs, the need to maintain the specificities of the wine sector.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
B

BDSI

· · filed 27 Jun 2022 · source

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the revision of the EU rules on geographical indications. Our comments are as follows: Article 1(1)(a) Processed foods are not agricultural products. Therefore, “and food” should be added to each of the articles of the Regulation. Article 12(4) and (5) Food with PGIs, like all other foods, will also have to meet future sustainability requirements.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

AREPO welcomes the objectives that the European Commission intends to achieve through this proposal for a regulation. However, the ambitions set are not always adequately supported by the legislative provisions. In this regard, we would like to submit the following observations and recommendations.

LinkedInX
IT

International Trademark Association (INTA)

· · filed 24 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

The International Trademark Association (INTA) would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to provide feedback on its consultation to the “EU proposal for regulation on geographical indications for wines, spirit drinks, and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products”. Our detailed comments can be found in the attached document.

LinkedInX
KF

Kompetenzzentrum für Ernährung (KErn)

· · filed 24 Jun 2022 · source

The Competence Center for Nutrition (KErn) is a subordinate authority of the Bavarian State Ministry for Nutrition, Agriculture and Forestry (StMELF). Among others, it carries out several projects in the subject “geographical indications and sustainability” and is therefore strongly involved in the topic area.

LinkedInX
C

CNAOL

· · filed 23 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

Opinion of CNAOL CNAOL — the National Council for Dairy Designations of Origin — brings together all the French PDO and PGI protection and management organisations (ODG). PDOs (46 cheeses, 3 butter and 2 creams) and milk PGI (9 cheeses and 1 cream) account for an average of 270 000 tonnes of products marketed each year.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AA

Assocantuccini Association of Cantuccini Toscani PGI Producers

· · filed 22 Jun 2022 · source

Having read the Proposal of European Regulation on Geographical Indications, we would like to stress how the issue of sustainability is not a question concerning in a special way the producers of GIs, as asserted under point 12 of the preliminary considerations, but an horizontal one, concerning rather the whole food sector.

LinkedInX
EF

Eurogroup for Animals

· · filed 22 Jun 2022 · source

PDF

Eurogroup for Animals welcomes the European Commission's proposal on the revision of the geographical indications (GIs) scheme for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products. Why Animal Welfare in GIs Matters The proposal identifies limitations in the existing framework, including the need to integrate sustainability and animal welfare considerations.

LinkedInX
SF

SLOW FOOD

· · filed 21 Jun 2022 · source

While we welcome the recognition that "As sustainability concerns have become more accentuated in recent years, GI and TSG production is not or not systematically taking them into consideration" (p. 5), we regret that “inclusion by the GI producer group of sustainability criteria in the product specification” remain voluntary (art. 12).

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 61 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.