NGO · Spain · EU Transparency Register 621929318922-12
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #376 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track WWF in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at WWF España? so we know who speaks for it.
WWF España filed 4 positions between 25 Nov 2020 and 1 Aug 2025, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
WWF Spain is concerned about the proposal to amend Directive 91/676/EEC which allows inorganic livestock manure fertilisers (RENURE fertilisers) to be exempted from the application limit of 170 kg N/ha. This will not reduce the nitrogen load in water bodies and does not consider key aspects such as soil typology, climate or absorption capacity of different crops.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
WWF Spain strongly supports the proposed ban on fur trade in Europe, both for ethical issues and its impact on biodiversity and health. Escapes from American mink farms, an invasive species, affect endangered species such as the European mink or Iberian mink. They are also potential outbreaks of zoonoses such as COVID-19. References in attachment.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Consumers demand environmentally friendly and socially fair food. However, the current quality certification and denominations (public and private) do not ensure — except in exceptional cases — that these aspects are respected.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
WWF Spain expresses its deep concern at the European Commission’s proposal to simplify the CAP Strategic Plans, which has been carried out without a transparent consultation process and without an environmental impact assessment.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put WWF España next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 11.
Everything on this page comes from WWF España’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.