Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
BJU

Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz

Public authority · Germany

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Bundesministerium in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz filed 2 positions between 25 Nov 2020 and 18 Dec 2020, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

Geographical indication protection for craft and industrial productsfiled 18 Dec 2020source

So far, only geographical indications of agricultural products (AGRI-GIs) for food, spirits, wines and aromatised wine products are protected in the EU. Such an EU system of protection is not available for geographical indications of non-agricultural products (NON-AGRI-GIs).

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Geographical Indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural productsfiled 25 Nov 2020source

The initiative to strengthen the protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs is generally welcomed. However, further simplification of procedures must not lead to restrictions on the rights of all parties involved, for example by unduly shortening time limits for appeals. Furthermore, sustainability aspects must not restrict the protection of PGIs and PDOs.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.