FOUR PAWS International welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commissions Fur Free Europe Call for Evidence. In our submission, we outline why Option 2a comprehensive ban on fur farming and on the placing on the market of farmed fur products, including imports from non-EU countriesis the only viable and future-proof solution.
VIER PFOTEN International
NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 69150873293-75
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #133 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Wien, Austria
- EU office
- Bruxelles
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track VIER in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at VIER PFOTEN International? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
VIER PFOTEN International filed 5 positions between 14 Mar 2024 and 25 Jun 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
FOUR PAWS is the global animal welfare organization for animals under direct human influence, which reveals suffering, rescues animals in need and protects them. We much welcome this Proposal for a Regulation and appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback to it. Please find attached our input, which we hope will prove useful in refining the Proposal, and in any further deliberations.
We welcome the opportunity to provide input on the proposed amendment to the annex I of regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 through this public consultation. As an organization committed to the protection of animal welfare, we acknowledge the importance of continuously improving stunning methods in light of evolving scientific evidence.
FOUR PAWS supports efforts to preserve local slaughter capacity where it contributes to shorter supply chains and better welfare for animals in the final stages. However, any reduction in the physical presence of Official Veterinarians (OVs) and any change in how post-mortem inspections are performed must not compromise animal welfare and public health.
FOUR PAWS welcomes the ECs efforts to support the viability of local slaughterhouses. Decentralised systems can reduce transport times, stress for animals, and contribute to lowering the spread of infectious diseases by avoiding highly concentrated production and long transport chains. Ensuring local capacity is therefore critical for both animal welfare and biosecurity resilience.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Deutscher Tierschutzbund e.V. · 5 files in common
- Eurogroup for Animals · 4 files in common
- Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE) · 4 files in common
- Copa · 3 files in common
- Bundestierärztekammer e.V. · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 15.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from VIER PFOTEN International’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.