Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2025/0133(COD) · Council Adoption

Amending certain Directives as regards digitalisation and common specifications (Omnibus IV)

74 submissions from 72 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 80 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 74 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee IMCORapporteur Reinier Van Lanschot (Greens/EFA)
  1. Committee Approved the Provisional Agreement · 14 Jul 2026
  2. Approval of the provisional agreement with the Council by the EP committee responsible · 14 Jul 2026
  3. Deliberations in Coreper · 26 Jun 2026
  4. Endorsement of the provisional agreement by Coreper · 26 Jun 2026
  5. Endorsement of the provisional agreement by Coreper · 24 Jun 2026

Who showed up

55 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 10 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 5.5 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 55Civil society 10Public authorities, academia, other 9

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

50 of 72
in the EU Register
276
full-time lobbying staff
€36.6M+
declared costs a year
192
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 3 Sept 2025 — it ran from 23 May 2025.

Policy area
Industry (DG GROW)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Council Adoption
Lead committee
IMCO
Commission reference
COM(2025)503

How it got here

  1. Prop dir3 Sept 2025

74 positions · showing 25

EF

Eclipse Foundation AISBL

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

We appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on the omnibus proposals for a directive and a regulation to align product legislation with the digital age. Free and open source software (FOSS) is, by many measurements, the largest category of software today. Europes IT systems and European innovation are powered largely by FOSS. Eclipse Foundation is the largest FOSS foundation based in Europe.

LinkedInX
AI

Apple Inc.

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Apple response - Omnibus IV proposal Table of Contents 1. 2. 3. Introduction On the benefits of digitization for Europe A more ambitious EU plan - Extending Omnibus IV s scope A. Regulatory Information B. Labels C. Consumer information 4. Ensuring regulatory consistency - Avoid new complex physical requirements 5. Conclusion 1.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
FD

Forbrugerrådet Tænk (The Danish Consumer Council)

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Raising standards for consumers POSITION PAPER ANEC reply to the European Commission proposals on Omnibus Directive and Regulation Aligning product legislation with the digital age Contact: [name removed] [email removed] [name removed] – [email removed] The European Consumer Voice in Standardisation aisbl ANEC is supported financially by the European Union & EFTA Ref: ANEC-WP1-2025-G-051 02/09/2025 Rue d’Arlon 80 –…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
F

FIEEC

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Definition and Concerns "Common specifications" are defined in the proposed directive on digitization and alignment of common specifications as an alternative to harmonized standards. But their development is seen as a threat to the current European Standardization System (ESS).

LinkedInX
Z

ZDH

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Common specifications The ZDH is convinced that in any case common specifications should only be consid-ered as a last resort measure. The primacy of stakeholder driven harmonised stand-ards must be preserved as the main way to facilitate compliance and provide presump-tion of conformity.

LinkedInX
II

ITI - Information Technology Industry Council

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

ITI intends to respond to the recent amendments proposed by the European Commission as part of the "Omnibus IV" package, which aims to introduce changes across a series of regulations and directives. In particular, the proposal seeks to advance two horizontal objectives: (i) promoting the digitalization of product-related compliance obligations, and (ii) introducing the possibility to rely on common specifications…

LinkedInX
FL

French liaison comitee on PED and SPVD

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Observations on COM (2025) 503 URL ‘Have you say’: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14698Omnibus-Directive-Aligning-product-legislation-with-the-digital-age_en Observations from the French liaison committee on Pressure Equipment Directive 2014/68/UE and on Simple Pressure Vessel Directive 2014/29/UE. I.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
TD

The Danish Agency for Digital Government

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

European Commission Feedback from The Danish Agency for Digital Government on the draft Omnibus Directive Overall The Danish Agency for Digital Government supports the proposed regulation by the European Commission on digitalization of paper requirements and common specifications. However we would like to draw your attention to the differences in the two provisions below.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
EF

European Furniture Industries Confederation (EFIC)

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

EFIC welcomes the possibility to comment on the draft implementing Regulation as regards digitalisation and common specifications, that has been put forward in the framework of the Omnibus IV package. We are a creative, versatile and dynamic sector, composed mainly by SMEs and microenterprises. Our industry is part of a complex value chain, with a broad range of designs, products and materials.

LinkedInX
MS

A single, predictable conformity path is essential for EU competitiveness and effective market surveillance. METSTA welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the Omnibus package. METSTA (Mechanical Engineering and Metals Industry Standardization) is a strategic standardization partner for Finnish technology and export industries.

LinkedInX
SE

SPECTARIS e.V.

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

SPECTARIS e. V. Berlin | September 3rd 2025 POSITION Ref. Ares(2025)7177579 - 03/09/2025 SPECTARIS Position Consultation feedback On Proposal for the Omnibus Directive Aligning product legislation with the digital age - COM(2025)503 Considerations for the Optical Sector and Personal Protective Equipment About SPECTARIS SPECTARIS is the German industrial association for optics, photonics, analytical, and medical…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
NB

Notified Body IFTH

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

We support the removal of user manuals for professional protective clothing. The user manual is not kept by the employee during their work activities, so they won't consult it while working. Professional PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) is provided by the employer, who remains responsible for training employees and for the correct use of the PPE.

LinkedInX
JB

Japan Business Council in Europe (JBCE)

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Please find attached JBCEs position paper on the proposals for a Directive on the digitalisation and alignment of common specifications under the Omnibus IV package. JBCE welcomes the Commissions initiative and highlights the need to more boldly embrace digitalization approaches, remove physical requirements, ensure horizontal alignment across the NLF, and prioritise international standards over EU-specific common…

LinkedInX
EE

Ecommerce Europe

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Ecommerce Europe is grateful for the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposals for a Regulation and a Directive on Aligning product legislation with the digital age. While our association is overall supportive of tapping digital solutions to simplify reporting obligations, the proposals raise some procedural and practical questions.

LinkedInX
D

DIGITALEUROPE

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

FINAL DRAFT – 29 AUGUST 2025 Less paper, more standards: The case for digitalisation and for repairing, not replacing, Europe’s standardisation system Executive summary The fourth omnibus proposal touches on two important areas for European industry: the digitalisation of product documentation – which can reduce burdens for companies and take forward Europe’s digital transformation – and the generalisation of common…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
AH

APPLiA (Home Appliance Europe)

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Policy paper on Omnibus IV (Paper vs. Digital documentation & Common Specifications) 1/10 Paper vs. Digital documentation We acknowledge the Commission’s intention to promote digital user manuals as a means to reduce paper consumption, lower costs, and minimise CO₂ emissions.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
EL

EUROPEAN LIFT ASSOCIATION

· · filed 3 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

ELA2025-038 2025-06-26 Formatted: Font: Arial Proposed amendment of the Lifts Directive 2014/33/EU The European Commission has introduced an omnibus proposal for a directive COM(2025)503 updating sectoral laws. ELA wishes to share industry comments on the proposed amendment of the Lifts Directive.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
II

Inter IKEA Group

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

The IKEA product range includes over 9,500 products sold in 63 markets, and we actively participate in over 100 standardisation committees. Drawing on decades of experience, we welcome the European Commissions ambition in Omnibus IV to modernise EU product legislation and reduce compliance burdens.

LinkedInX
VE

VDMA e.V.

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

VDMA welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Omnibus proposals COM(2025)503 and COM(2025)504 and would like to address the element for Common Specifications only. In light of the increasing European Commissions intention to use Common Specifications (CS) as a regulatory fallback mechanism to harmonised European Standards (hEN) within the European Single Market, and their embedding in both new and revised legal…

LinkedInX
EA

EPTA aisbl

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

EPTA appreciates the opportunity to give feedback. We support: A homogenous approach across product legislation Digitalisation of product information requirements to fit the digital age Digital only communication with authorities and notified bodies We propose to: Add missing product legislation to unleash full benefits of digitalisation and simplification Delete specific requirement for the OND to avoid…

LinkedInX
D

DI

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

DI appreciates the opportunity to comment on targeted amendments permitting the use of common specifications and paperless documentation within existing NLF legislation, namely COM(2025) 503 final and COM(2025) 504 final. Summary: DI supports the Commissions proposal to enable digital fulfilment of information obligations.

LinkedInX
CC

Cecurity.com

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Cecurity.com calls on the Commission to preserve the integrity and credibility of the European standardisation system, building on: legal certainty, stakeholder trust, technical robustness, and international compatibility.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
E

EFUTURA

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to react to this proposal. eFutura is a professional association that brings together and accompanies digital players around the document and the Data. We are involved in standardisation work and influence the evolution of French (AFNOR), European (ETSI and CEN) and international (ISO) standards in our fields of electronic archiving, Cyber Security, Electronic Facture…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
C

CERTIFICALL

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

CERTIFICALL’s reply to the consultation on the proposal for a Omnibus Directive to align product legislation with the digital sector September 2025 Introduction CERTIFICALL thanked the European Commission for the opportunity offered to contribute to the public consultation on the proposal for a Omnibus Directive.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
L

LightingEurope

· · filed 2 Sept 2025 · source

PDF

Brussels, 02 September 2025 LightingEurope Position on the Omnibus IV proposal for a Directive and a Regulation as regards the digitalisation and alignment of common specifications Introduction The following input presents LightingEurope’s position to the recent European Commission’s (EC) proposal for a Directive and a Regulation as regards the digitalization and alignment of common specifications.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 74 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.