JMC would like to ask the European Commission to take into account the following proposals in the further regulatory simplification activities: 1. Exemption of packaging imported into the EU with the HS code within the scope and subsequently replaced with identical packaging that is already placed on the market which is supporting, protecting, or carrying the product therein.
Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment
Industry association · Japan
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Japan in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment filed 5 positions between 26 Feb 2021 and 23 Jan 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
February 26 2021 Dear Sirs The Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment (“JMC”) is a non-profit organization with the character of a public-interest corporation. We welcome the opportunity to contribute the public consultation.
We welcome the opportunity to participate in the public comment call for the Omnibus IV Proposed Regulation (COM (2025) 504) for Digitalisation and alignment of common specifications. JMC strongly supports the policy of Omnibus package IV simplifying product legislation and reducing bureaucracy in the European Single Market.
We would like to ask that the final amending Directive be in line with the following proposals. 1.Common specifications should be removed altogether from Article 2 of the Proposed Directive (COM (2025) 503) (Proposed Amendment to Directive 2011/65/EU). Reason: Electrical and electronic equipment and machinery equipment are often subject to multiple product legislation.
We, JMC would like to request that the final regulation be revised along the proposals outlined below, so that the requirements remain reasonable and simple while in line with Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. 1. ANNEX I: We propose that EUBR Part A Labelling information shall set minimum necessary requirement, and label format in Part B Label design shall be optional.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 74.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.