Industry association · France · EU Transparency Register 36474004071-38
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #22 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track FIEEC in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at FIEEC? so we know who speaks for it.
FIEEC filed 8 positions between 9 Dec 2024 and 18 Jun 2026, across 8 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
The FIEEC shares the objective pursued by the European Commission: reindustrialise Europe, accelerate its decarbonisation and reduce strategic dependencies in key sectors. The Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA) is part of this ambition, within the Clean Industrial Deal, with a logic of lead markets, simplification of procedures and support for low-carbon and Made in EU products.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
In the context of opening a contribution to the Digital Network Act, FIEEC would like to alert the European Commission to the need to regulate the arrangements for closing mobile networks. In France, the shutdown of 2G-3G networks highlighted the limits of the framework in this area.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The call for evidence organised here by the Commission addresses crucial topics in the implementation of the CBAM and the consideration of its impacts. The difficulties faced by the three implementing acts are further increased for those sectors that have requested to be covered by the CBAM. This is why FIEEC calls for the suspension of the scheme until structural obstacles are removed.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Assessment on Costs and Benefits We are not convinced that third party service providers are essential for the functioning of a DPP system as they raise additional costs, and economic operators can also ensure persistent DPPs even in case of liquidation, insolvency or cessation of activity. The need for a back-up DPP at the DPP creation should be evaluated.
Standardization is not only a technical tool, but it is a strategic pillar of industrial, technological and commercial policies. It enables Europe to: Promote its values of safety, sustainability, and quality Support innovation and the energy and digital transition Reinforce European technological and industrial competitiveness and sovereignty in a multipolar world The revision of the European Standardization…
Definition and Concerns "Common specifications" are defined in the proposed directive on digitization and alignment of common specifications as an alternative to harmonized standards. But their development is seen as a threat to the current European Standardization System (ESS).
The FIEEC calls on the European Commission to make market surveillance a strategic priority for the functioning of the single market and for the competitiveness of European industry. The primary challenge is not the introduction of new obligations but the ability to equitably and proportionately enforce existing rules, focusing control resources on actors and distribution channels presenting the highest risks.
FIEEC appreciates the opportunity to provide the following comments on the proposed amendments to Annex 1 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1021, which implements the EUs international commitments under the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants. The recent addition (Spring 2025) includes restrictions and exemptions on use of medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (MCCPs).
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 133.
Everything on this page comes from FIEEC’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.