Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2022/0298(COD) · In Force

Protection of workers from asbestos

41 submissions from 38 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 57 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 41 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee EMPLRapporteur Véronique Trillet-lenoir (Renew)
  1. Published in the Official Journal · 30 Nov 2023
  2. Signature by the President of the EP and by the President of the Council · 23 Nov 2023
  3. Signed · 22 Nov 2023
  4. PLENARY_ACTIVITY · 20 Nov 2023
  5. Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 23 Oct 2023

Who showed up

16 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 18 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 16Civil society 18Public authorities, academia, other 7

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

19 of 38
in the EU Register
97
full-time lobbying staff
€13.3M+
declared costs a year
56
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 1 Dec 2022 — it ran from 6 Oct 2022.

Policy area
Employment (DG EMPL)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
EMPL
Commission reference
COM(2022)489

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment22 Mar 2022
  2. Prop dir1 Dec 2022

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 41 submissions.

FF

FEDERATION FRANCAISE DU BATIMENT

· · filed 1 Dec 2022 · source

PDF

The Fédération Française du Bâtiment (French Building Federation) is attentive to the work carried out by the European Union on safety and health at work, and more particularly on the subject of laminator. In this connection, the FFB would like to make some comments on the proposal for a revision of Directive 2009/148/EC concerning the lamiant position during work presented by the European Commission on 28…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
CE

Ceemet - European Tech and Industry Employers

· · filed 1 Dec 2022 · source

PDF

Ceemet response to the European Commission feedback on an adopted act amending Directive 2009/148/EC on Asbestos Ceemet welcomes the initiative of the European Commission, released on 28 September 2022, as it proposes an occupational exposure limit value (OEL) of 0.01 fibres/cm³ which was the proposal of both governments and employers in the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health.

LinkedInX
DG

Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung e.V. (DGUV)

· · filed 30 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The German Social Accident Insurance(Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung, DGUV), is the umbrella association of the social accident insurance institutions for industry, trade and the public sectors. It looks after the joint interests of its members and promotes the work they do for the benefit of insured persons and enterprises.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ES

European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)

· · filed 29 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), as the leading professional organisation for medical oncology representing more than 25,000 oncology professionals from over 160 countries worldwide, welcomes the efforts of the European Commission to address the health-related risks stemming from asbestos by proposing to revise the Asbestos at Work Directive.

LinkedInX
IV

Instituto Valenciano de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (INVASSAT)

· · filed 24 Nov 2022 · source

Having reviewed the proposal to amend Directive 2009/148/EC on asbestos, INVASSAT has made the following comments: 1. The main amendments included in this proposal are the reduction of the limit value to 0,01 fibres/cm³ and the possibility of using electron microscopy in addition to phase contrast microscopy, which is a more modern and sensitive methodology.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RE

Rohrleitungssanierungsverband e. V.

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

In principle, we fully support the political objective set out in the EP resolution of contributing to long-term EU-wide prevention of exposure to asbestos in everyday life. Recommendations that subordinate to this objective without consideration of feasibility and concrete impacts are critical if, from our point of view, they have the opposite effect in the medium term.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
M

3M

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

3M welcomes this initiative of the European Commission to further protect workers from asbestos exposure and promote occupational health and safety. While reviewing Directive 2009/148/EC, we wish the EU legislators to consider the following policy actions: • Promote fit testing to help protect respirator wearers: fit testing, an important and straightforward step, helps ensure workers are utilising the full benefits…

LinkedInX
FF

FEDERATION FRANCAISE DU BATIMENT

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

The Fédération Française du Bâtiment is attentive to the work currently being carried out by the European Union on safety and health at work, and in particular on the draft revision of Directive 2009/148/EC on exposure to asbestos at work. The FFB would like to comment on one of the options considered in the context of the revision of the asbestos directive to reduce the occupational exposure limit value (OEL).

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ER

European Respiratory Society

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

The European Respiratory Society (ERS) welcomes the opportunity to input to the revision of Directive 2009/148/EC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work. The contribution of occupation to the causation of lung cancer has been shown to be considerably larger than for most other common cancers.

LinkedInX
AC

Algemene Centrale - ABVV

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

Today there are still too many workers and individuals who may or may not be in contact with asbestos. The harmful effects of what asbestos is now and what it does with human bodies are not immediately visible/tangible. And suddenly, those that are close to your heart are no longer part of your life because of the life-threatening effects of asbestos.

Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
E

EFBWW

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

In spite of the overall ban of asbestos in Europe, we still and will face in the future problems with asbestos at workplaces and in the society. From our point of view, a revision of Directive 2009/148/EC is absolutely needed.

LinkedInX
C

Ceemet

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

Introduction The revision, or setting of, Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) and Biological Limit Values (BLVs) for substances must be done based on sound scientific evidence and via social partner consultation. A careful impact assessment must be made on forthcoming proposals for substances based on the costs and administrative burdens that follow.

LinkedInX
EB

European Builders Confederation (EBC)

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

The European Builders Confederation (EBC) reiterates its firm belief that workers’ health is a top priority for the construction sector, as construction SMEs take the utmost care to ensure that training and equipment of the highest standards is always provided to workers across the EU.

LinkedInX
IO

Institution of Occupational Safety and Health

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

Recommendations We are conscious that reviewing or developing regulations for managing asbestos in the workplace -while necessary-, will not solely provide the solution to this occupational issue. In addition to asbestos not being in general use in the EU, this needs to be encompassed by a set of measures, including prioritising substitution of carcinogenic substances in the authorisation and restriction processes…

LinkedInX
IU

International Union of Property Owners (UIPI)

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

Following the launch of the European Commission’s initiative to improve workers’ health and safety by revising Directive 2009/148/EC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work, the International Union of Property Owners wants to reiterate the importance to ensure building occupants’ and workers’ health and safety.

LinkedInX

We welcome the increased focus of the Commission and Parliament on this serious issue, which unfortunately still takes the lives of too many people both in Denmark and in the rest of Europe. Looking at and Rørs’ clear belief, there is a need for a European framework directive for national asbestos removal strategies in the EU Member States.

Filed in Danish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ZG

ZDH German Confederation of Skilled Crafts and SMEs

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

ZDH is of the opinion that the current EU legal framework is sufficient, both in terms of REACH Annex XVII restrictions as well as in terms of occupational safety and health legislation. The EU Commission's impact assessment correctly recognises that the main risk from asbestos is in the HANDLING of asbestos, i.e.

LinkedInX
S

SMEunited

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

SMEunited believes that harmonised implementation of the existing OEL in the relevant sectors is the right approach and should be the first step before considering to further tighten limits, which, in addition, may not be feasible to be implemented in practice by Crafts and SMEs. Additional costs for the sectors more at risk of dealing with asbestos and consumers should be taken into account.

LinkedInX
S

SIPTU

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

Below are the comments from the Construction Sector of the Services Industrial Professional & Technical Union (SIPTU) in Ireland. Reports over the years indicate that 100,000 people die every year in the EU27+UK of occupational cancer and that exposure to asbestos is a significant factor in these deaths. Asbestos production peaked between the years 1940 and 1985 and was only banned in the EU in 2005.

LinkedInX
CB

CSC Bâtiment Industrie & Energie

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

The BIE (Industrie Industrie Energie Building) represents 300 000 Belgian members of the construction, energy and chemical sectors. It is part of the CSC (1 600 000 Belgian charts). The BIE CSC supports the request to develop a SEETA based on the following pillars: 1) national asbestos removal plans — Request for a European framework 2) detection and maintenance of a register of asbestos — Request for a European…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
G

GdW

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

The housing sector sees the dangers of improper handling of building materials containing asbestos and the resulting exposure if necessary. Concepts of risk prevention, information and the gradual removal of asbestos from the housing stock have been implemented for years in a conscious sense of responsibility and with a high level of organisational and financial effort.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
A

AMISUR

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

AMISUR is pleased to participate in this initiative to improve the health and safety of workers against the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work. Asbestos is killed by lung cancer and mesothelioma, as well as other cancers, every year in the EU. We call for a comprehensive strategy for the safe removal of all asbestos in the EU in order to protect workers.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AR

Aarsleff Rohrsanierung

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

We consider the resolution of the European Parliament on P9-TA(2021)0427 “Protection of workers from asbestos” of 20 October 2021 with recommendations to the Commission on the protection of workers from asbestos to be extremely problematic. This makes work on or on materials containing asbestos more difficult or impossible.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
DG

Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung e.V.

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

The DGUV [German Statutory Accident Insurance] is the umbrella association for professional associations in this branch and governmental accident insurers. It looks after the joint interests of its members and promotes the work they do for the benefit of insured persons and enterprises.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
C

CGIL

· · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

National CGIL. The debate that has taken place in Europe in recent years has been significant. The Obbiettivo still needs to be reached. The themes of the building union platform focus on a large number of topics that can be widely shared, but I would like to highlight a couple of them. 1) mapping: this is FUNDAMENTAL.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 41 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.