The European Federation of Building and Woodworkers (EFBWW) has 77 affiliated trade unions in 36 countries and represents a total of 1,5 million workers in the construction and woodworking sectors. The EFBWW considers public procurement to be crucial in counteracting harmful business models in the construction sector. Public procurement is an important economic source for the construction sector (approx.
European Federation of Building and Woodworkers
Trade union · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 57745478360-42
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #17 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Member of the ETUC
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade unions and professional associations
- Registered as
- EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF BUILDING AND WOODWORKERS (EFBWW)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at European Federation of Building and Woodworkers? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
European Federation of Building and Woodworkers filed 9 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 10 Jun 2026, across 9 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
What they argued
The European Federation of Building and Woodworkers (EFBWW) strongly call on EU legislators to ensure that the EU Inc. regime is not applicable to the construction sector. Our position can be found in the attached file. The proposed regulation fails to account for the specific structural risks inherent to construction, thereby creating significant risks for abuse and spread of letterbox companies.
The EFBWW is particularly concerned that labour mobility is increasingly being instrumentalised in discussions on competitiveness, housing crisis and cross-border economic activities and promoted as a primary solution to labour shortages in the construction sector, as reflected in initiatives such as the European Single Market Strategy, the Strategy for Housing Construction and the proposed Construction Services…
EFBWW represents trade unions in the construction, wood, forestry, and building materials sectors across Europe. EFBWW calls for a VET Strategy that is worker-centred therefore ensuring that skills policies serve workers and society, not competitiveness alone.
The Fair Labour Mobility Package should be a package for improving working conditions and enhancing enforcement, not a package for deregulation. The Commissions own Call for Evidence identifies the right points, notably long subcontracting chains in high-risk sectors, rising numbers of posted TCNs and enforcement gaps.
Strengthening ELA is essential if the EU is serious about fair labour mobility. Fraud and abuse can only be tackled effectively with stronger enforcement capacity at all levels, particularly at the European level as we cannot allow accountability to stop at national borders. A revised ELA mandate must therefore provide the Authority with the resources and mandate to support effective cross-border enforcement.
The Construction Services Act should not liberalise at the expense of workers. It should be an instrument to improve working conditions and attractivity. This can only be achieved if we strengthen enforcement and tackle fraudulent and abusive business models that are over-reliant on subcontracting and bogus self-employment. Fraud and abuse flourish where enforcement is weak.
EFBWW welcomes the ECs 18 July 2025 proposal revising Directive 2004/37/EC on carcinogens, mutagens, and reprotoxic substances. According to EU-OSHAs 2024 WES, over 60% of construction and wood workers face multiple carcinogen exposures, often on mobile sites, short-term contracts, or as self-employed, with insufficient protection.
The EFBWW supports an ambitious ESSPASS that strengthens enforcement and worker protection while improving practical access to social security rights in cross-border situations. ESSPASS must deliver real-time verification and effective access to data, not simply a digital storage of scanned documents.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) · 7 files in common
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 6 files in common
- BDA | German Employers · 6 files in common
- Deutsche Sozialversicherung Europavertretung (DSV) · 5 files in common
- DGB · 5 files in common
Showing 5 of 92.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from European Federation of Building and Woodworkers’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.