Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ENS

ENSHPO

Other · Germany

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track ENSHPO in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at ENSHPO? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files ENSHPO engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from ENSHPO or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

ENSHPO filed 2 positions between 16 Mar 2022 and 9 Mar 2026, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2022 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence – Digital Omnibus on AI (Omnibus VII)filed 9 Mar 2026PDFsource

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - The European Network of Safety and Health Professional Organisations (ENSHPO) submits this comprehensive analytical report in response to the European Commission's Call for Evidence regarding the Digital Fitness Check. The evaluation of the cumulative impact of the European Union's digital rulebook on competitiveness, innovation, and strategic autonomy is a timely and strictly necessary exercise.

Protection of workers from asbestosfiled 16 Mar 2022source

On behalf of the Danish Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine for the EU-process on asbestos: Although a revised OEL is of importance mostly as a signal that asbestos is an important occupational problem, in our experience other tools are probably of greater importance.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put ENSHPO next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from ENSHPO’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.