Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2026/0139(COD) · Commission Proposal

Chips Act 2.0

5 submissions from 5 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 215 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 5 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Next Feedback on adopted proposal open: Evaluation and Revision of the Chips Act ("Chips Act 2.0") — closes 10 Sep 2026
  1. Deliberations in Council working party · 24 Jul 2026
  2. Deliberations in Council working party · 17 Jul 2026
  3. Deliberations in Council working party · 14 Jul 2026
  4. Deliberations in Council working party · 8 Jul 2026
  5. Deliberations in Council working party · 1 Jul 2026

Who showed up

3 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 3Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 1

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation is open — 11 days left to submit. It closes on 10 Sept 2026.

Responding? PolicySpeak drafts consultation responses grounded in your organization’s own positions. Request access.

Policy area
Digital & tech (DG CNECT)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Commission Proposal
Commission reference
COM(2026)504

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment28 Nov 2025
  2. Public consultation28 Nov 2025
  3. Proposal for a regulation10 Sept 2026 · upcoming

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

5 positions

CO

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

· · filed 28 Aug 2026 · source

PDF

The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise welcomes the Commission’s ambition to strengthen Europe’s competitiveness, innovation capacity and resilience in the semiconductor sector. Semiconductors are a fundamental enabling technology for large parts of European industry and a well-functioning semiconductor supply is important for both digitalisation and the green transition.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
OF

OpenMined Foundation

· · filed 15 Aug 2026 · source

PDF

OpenMined is a non-profit building open-source, privacy-preserving AI infrastructure used by data holders, researchers and public bodies in the EU and internationally. We welcome the proposed Chips Act 2.0, but it is silent on confidential computing: the terms "trusted execution environment", "secure enclave" and "remote attestation" do not appear in the proposal, even though the EU's wider sovereignty agenda the…

LinkedInX
VC

Veritas Core

· · filed 11 Jul 2026 · source

1. Executive Summary: The Structural Fallacy of Digital Twin Supply Chain Governance The Chips Act 2.0 correctly highlights that deep dependencies and vulnerabilities across advanced and mature semiconductor value chains create severe geostrategic exposures for the Union.

LinkedInX
T

TNO

· · filed 10 Jul 2026 · source

Thank you for the opportunity to share our feedback. Multiple improvements and positive points to mention. Including a focus on demand side; important, though let's realize that it will take time to have the desired impact. Small question: I wonder how non-EU demand might be included in the methodology. Europe is famous for its high-tech equipment and materials.

LinkedInX
P

Prophesee

· · filed 8 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Prophesee, a French deeptech fabless born from public research, is the world leader in event-driven neuromorphic vision sensors, industrialised with Sony and STMicroelectronics for embedded AI, from industry to defence: the very position that the text seeks to strengthen.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 5 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.