Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Mid-term evaluation of the ERDF, the CF and the JTF 2021-2027

34 submissions from 34 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 44 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 34 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

13 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 6 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.2 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 13Civil society 6Public authorities, academia, other 15

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

14 of 34
in the EU Register
61
full-time lobbying staff
€6.5M+
declared costs a year
38
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 9 Oct 2023 — it ran from 11 Sept 2023.

Where it stands
in_force_closed
Adoption expected
31 Mar 2025

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · evaluation9 Oct 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Evl.

Showing 25 of 34 submissions.

R

RePlanet

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

In the RePlanet Alliance response to the European Commission consultation: European Regional Development Fund, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund for 2021-2027 mid-term evaluation, RePlanet would like to emphasize the importance of making funds available, without discrimination, to all technologies and techniques qualifying for the criteria set by the Commission itself with the help of its own research body.

LinkedInX
RV

Region Västerbotten

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

Västerbotten is part of northern Sweden, Northern Sparsely Populated Areas (NSPA), the EU and the Arctic. Highlights the importance of a well-functioning and effective cohesion policy with local and regional tools for long-term development that address the unique challenges and opportunities of the territory; EU cohesion policy is of great importance for Northern Sweden’s potential for regional development and it is…

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
NK

Norrbottens Kommuner

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

The NSPA in the European Arctic area are regions with few people over the vast areas and long grounds in a harsh climate. As part of the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas Network (NSPA), Norrbotten’s municipalities believe that it is Extrely importing that cohesion policy funds are made available to and adapted to narrow actors in Sparsely popular environments with insufficient capacity and long indications to the…

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
BF

Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland e.V.

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

1. Low-threshold participation opportunities for civil society environmental associations The ERDF is a valuable funding instrument in Germany for nature-based climate change mitigation/adaptation, nature conservation and biodiversity protection. In the past, for example, blue green infrastructure or bog rewetting projects have already been financed by the ERDF (e.g.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
G

GazelEnergie

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

The Just Transition Fund (JTF) initially aims to support the energy and green transition of regions historically dependent on fossil fuels. It is therefore logical that the French regions affected by the announced closure of coal-fired power plants have been included in the list of territories eligible for the JTF. However, several points can be traced back, in particular as regards eligibility for the fund.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
S

Snam

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

Snam welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Regional Development Fund, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund for 2021- 2027 mid-term evaluation. We recall the significant role of renewable and low carbon hydrogen for the energy transition as outlined in the FF55 as well as in the REPower EU, including hydrogen targets to 2030.

LinkedInX
ER

Eesti Roheline Liikumine

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

Thank you for the opportunity to have a say on the mid-term review of cohesion policy funds. It has been a great privilege to monitor the progress of the 2021-2027 funding period and to gather both good practices and concerns.

Filed in Estonian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GT

GIFEN, the French nuclear industry

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

GIFEN members welcome the mid-term evaluation of the European funds set in 2021 as part of the 2019 Green Deal which has the ambition of carbon neutrality of Europe by 2050. Since the launch of this program, the European Commission has taken further steps to boost sustainable investments. Action to counter climate change implies a radical change in industrial systems.

LinkedInX
CR

Conseil régional Ile de France

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

The Île-de-France Region wishes to be actively involved in assessing the implementation and progress of the ERDF for the period 2021-2027. In this connection, it wishes to draw up a number of findings arising from the implementation of its programme, approved by the European Commission in October 2022, but also from past experience.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
A

AECM

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

Dear Commission representatives, The European Association of Guarantee Institutions (AECM) welcomes the Commissions call for evidence for a mid-term evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund (CF), and the Just Transition Fund (JTF) for 2021-2027 and is pleased to provide its feedback enclosed. Thank you.

LinkedInX
DN

Diputación de Barcelona

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

The deployment of Cohesion Policy through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) in Spain is being affected by the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) Funds. The delay in the adoption of the Partnership Agreements with Spain and the ERDF Operational Programmes has also led to a delay in the publication of their calls for proposals which, by 3 t 2023, have not yet been published.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EB

EKD-Büro Brüssel

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

In principle, the ECS Brussels office welcomes the thematic focus and implementation of the ERDF. However, practical implementation does not fully exploit the potential that ERDF funding could have for social cohesion. In Germany, for example, Objective 4 of the Common Provisions Regulation (CPR) (a more social Europe) is currently covered by ERDF support only by the ESF+.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RG

Région Auvergne Rhône Alpes

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

The Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, the managing authority for European funds ERDF, JTF and ESF + wishes to propose several recommendations for the mid-term review of cohesion policy. The Regional Programme ERDF/ESF +/JTF 2021-2027, led by the Region, amounts to 880M of European funds, of which 77M from JTF and 660M from ERDF.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RG

Région Nouvelle-Aquitaine

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

The New Aquitaine Region is the ERDF managing authority for the period 2021-2027. It therefore welcomes the Commission’s opportunity to contribute to this consultation. Firstly, although the programming period officially started in 2021, New Aquitaine would like to recall that the Multiannual Financial Framework and the Cohesion Regulations were adopted very late.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RV

Region Västra Götaland

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

In the mid-term evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund, Cohesion Fund and Fund for a Just Transition 2021-2027 the Commission will review the funds' effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence with other policies and added value for the EU. In that context, it is important to bear in mind that the funds have not been given the right conditions to deliver on the targets set up within the programmes.

LinkedInX
DB

Deutscher Braunkohlen Industrie Verein eV

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

The German lignite industry welcomes the opportunity to give feedback on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Cohesion Fund (CF) and particularly the Just Transition Fund (JTF). The extraction of lignite and its use in German power plants will end by 2038 at the latest and by 2030 in the Rheinish lignite region. This is about 10 years earlier than originally planned by the companies and authorities.

LinkedInX
RO

Region of Jämtland Härjedalen

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

Region of Jämtland Härjedalen, part of the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas (NSPA), would like to highlight the importance of a well-functioning and efficient cohesion policy with local and regional tools, adapted to local and regional specificities, for long-term sustainable development.

LinkedInX
RN

Region Norrbotten

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

The regions in northern Sweden, like Region Norrbotten, are a part if the Northern Sparsely Populated Areas (NSPA). We want to highlight the importance of a well-functioning and efficient cohesion policy with local and regional tools for long-term development. The NSPA in the European Arctic area are regions with few people over vast areas and long distances in a harsh climate.

LinkedInX
TV

Teollisuuden Voima

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

TEOLLISUUDEN VOIMAS VIEWS ON THE EUS COHESION POLICY FUNDS Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) is grateful for the opportunity to provide input for the mid-term evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund (CF) and the Just Transition Fund (JTF). TVO considers these instruments useful for bolstering growth and enabling the green transition across the EU.

LinkedInX
RS

Region Stockholm

· · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

Stockholm Region will focus its consultation response on the experience gained during the programming phase of the ERDF in 20212027 when the programme proposal for the Stockholm Regional Fund was drawn up. The development of the programme proposal is based on Stockholm Region’s research and innovation strategy for smart specialisation and the region’s long-term development strategy RUFS 2050 – in accordance with the…

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
TG

Transdev Group

· · filed 7 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

THE FAIR TRANSITION TO MORE SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS REQUIRES INCREASED FUNDING FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT Supporting cities and regions in their transition and economic development has always been one of the fundamental objectives of the EU, whose cohesion policy represented a significant part of its budget.

LinkedInX
MU

Masarykova univerzita

· · filed 7 Oct 2023 · source

Masaryk University welcomes the continuous support of higher education and research by the ESIF. Nevertheless, we would like to add some comments and suggestions for further improvement of the Cohesion policy implementation: - Synergies with other community programmes although progress is significant, more shall be done. The start of these activities must already be in the programming stage, e.g.

LinkedInX
E

EGEC

· · filed 6 Oct 2023 · source

PDF

We welcome the support provided for geothermal in these funds but hope that minor interventions will be able to facilitate more cost-effective attainment of the EUs energy, climate, food security, greater support for geothermal heating, cooling, electricity, storage sustainable lithium extraction to protect Europe energy system from external threats and ensure industrial competitiveness as well as sustainable…

LinkedInX
KR

Kommunförbundet Jämtland Härjedalen

· · filed 6 Oct 2023 · source

When meeting multi-level governance, we notice that stakeholders use the same terms but load it with different meanings. The interpretative prerogative is often taken by a single stakeholder making for difficulties in forming relevant policies. For example, risking relevance from a local point of view to gain efficiency and effectiveness from a Commission perspective.

LinkedInX
RV

Region Västernorrland

· · filed 6 Oct 2023 · source

The Västernorrland region, which is part of the NSPA (northern sparsely populated regions), considers the mid-term evaluation of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund to be of great importance. The evaluation now being carried out needs to capture several aspects that are characteristic of our regions, but which may not be self-evident are the focus of an overall evaluation.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 34 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.