Industry association · Czechia · EU Transparency Register 0051598101480-69
7
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
7
legislative files
of 326 tracked
6
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 311 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #29 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2025
in the register since
Declares membership of
Eurelectric (https://www.eurelectric.org/)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Head office
Praha 4, Czech republic
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Svaz energetiky ČR? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Svaz energetiky ČR filed 7 positions between 5 Dec 2025 and 28 Aug 2026, across 7 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 6 times.
The Czech Energy Union supports the IAA’s objectives of strengthening the competitiveness of European industry, increasing the share of manufacturing industry in GDP and developing low-carbon technologies. At the same time, however, it points out that some of the proposed instruments may be counterproductive: reduce competition, increase energy costs and slow down investments in energy infrastructure, which is key…
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
The current EU taxonomy settings disadvantage nuclear energy, which is and will remain a key part of the Czech energy mix. Nuclear power is classified only temporarily and under restrictive conditions; similar limitations apply to gas, which is crucial for the energy transition and security of supply.
Czech Energy Association (CEA) generally opposes the proposed tightening of benchmarks, which further undermines the competitiveness of EU industry. Increasing emission costs contradicts the objective of supporting European industry and raises the risk of carbon leakage.
Czech Energy Association (CEA) considers the current design of the EU Taxonomy disadvantageous for nuclear energy, which plays and will continue to play a crucial role in the Czech energy mix. The Delegated Act includes nuclear energy only for a limited period and under very restrictive conditions.
The Czech Republic welcomes the proposal for an Environmental Omnibus and, in particular, the proposal for a regulation on speeding up environmental impact assessments, which we consider to be a key step towards simplifying EIA processes. However, in our view, the proposal for a regulation is not ambitious enough.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
The Czech Energy Union (SECR) supports the objective of modernising European rules on the connection of generators to the electricity system, but draws attention to the need to maintain technological neutrality, legal certainty and the economic proportionality of the new requirements. We consider the issue of the transition period to be crucial.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
In general, the Czech Republic welcomes the direction of the proposed revision of the EU ETS, which reflects some of the long-standing requirements of the Member States and the energy sector, in particular maintaining the important role of free allocation, adjusting the functioning of the MSR and easing the pace of the reduction of the cap.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Svaz energetiky ČR’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.