Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

EU anti-corruption strategy

45 submissions from 43 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 151 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 45 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

15 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 19 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 15Civil society 19Public authorities, academia, other 11

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

12 of 43
in the EU Register
33
full-time lobbying staff
€3.5M+
declared costs a year
26
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 6 Jul 2026 — it ran from 11 May 2026.

Policy area
Justice (DG JUST)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2026 · in 123 days

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence6 Jul 2026
  2. Public consultation6 Jul 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Communication.

45 positions · showing 25

PF

Partnerships for Integrity (P4I)

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Partnerships for Integrity (P4I) welcomes the preparation of an EU Anti-Corruption Strategy and supports the Commission's objective of a more coherent, coordinated, and whole-of-society response to corruption across policy areas.

LinkedInX
CP

Compliance Practitioners Association

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

1. The Commission should conduct ongoing monitoring of Member States progress in transposing Directive (EU) 2026/1021 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2026 on combating corruption. Such monitoring could include the submission by Member States of detailed plans for transposing the Directive, including milestones and the national authorities responsible, as well as periodic reports on the…

LinkedInX
CC

Christian Council International

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Christian Council International (CCI) appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback on the EU Anti-Corruption strategy. In the attached document, we highlight the importance of accountability and transparency in the field of addressing corruption in the European Union related to funding for sexual and reproductive health and rights and the advancement of rights associated with diverse sexual orientations, gender…

LinkedInX
LA

L'Afep - Association of Large French Companies

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

LAfep, the Association of Large French Companies, would like to thank the European Commission for this consultation. French businesses fully agree with the European Commissions assessment that an effective and ambitious anti-corruption strategy is needed.

LinkedInX
GC

Grupo CELAC-UE

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Strategic recommendations of the EU-CELAC Working Group for the EU Anti-Corruption Strategy 1. Consistently place transparency, participation and human rights at the centre of relations between the European Union and Latin America. 2.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

The adoption of Directive (EU) 2026/1021 marks a significant step towards harmonising the criminal law response to corruption in the private sector. However, the practical effectiveness of this framework will largely depend on whether Member States are provided with sufficiently clear guidance for interpreting and applying its key elements.

LinkedInX
M

MEDEF

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

A risk-based European strategy focused on the effectiveness of rules and the recognition of integrity frameworks The future European anti-corruption strategy should be structured around three complementary priorities: a risk-based approach, better enforcement of existing rules, and recognition of the most mature integrity frameworks.

LinkedInX
TI

Transparency International - BG

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Ladies and gentlemen, please find attached the contribution of the Transparency International - Bulgaria to the Call for Evidence on the EU Anti-Corruption Strategy. Yours sincerely, Kalin Slavov, ED P.S. The issue of sustainable funding for NGOs that work consistently in the field of anti-corruption should also be addressed, primarily through privileged access to funding and the creation of specialized funds, as…

LinkedInX
ME

MedTech Europe

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

The healthcare sector is an interconnected environment,bringing together a diverse range of stakeholders who play a vital role in advancing patient care,scientific innovation and public health.In this context, relationships with Healthcare Professionals and Healthcare Organisations are of strategic importance.The significance of these engagements has fostered a strong awareness of the responsibilities they entail…

LinkedInX
CA

Czech Academy of Sciences

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

The Czech Academy of Sciences welcomes the European Commissions initiative to develop a comprehensive EU Anti-Corruption Strategy. Directive (EU) 2026/1021 provides a common legal framework; the Strategy should complement it by supporting coherent implementation, cooperation, reliable evidence and measurable results, while avoiding duplication.

LinkedInX
EE

ENFCO - European Network for Compliance Officers

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

As the voice of compliance professionals across Europe - European Network of Compliance Officers (ENFCO) - believes that the new harmonised EU legislation in combating corruption is a major step forward. It will not however by itself create sufficient incentives for organisations to systematically invest in effective anti-corruption programs.

LinkedInX
BF

Blueprint for Free Speech

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Call for evidence feedback Blueprint for Free Speech is a non-profit registered in Germany that works internationally to promote freedom of expression, whistleblower protection and institutional transparency through research, advocacy and strategic support. We would like to offer the following inputs: 1. Whistleblower protection should be made the centrepiece of the strategy to fight corruption.

LinkedInX
TI

Transparency International Secretariat

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Progress in tackling corruption across the EU has stalled over the past decade. The regions average score in the 2025 CPI has declined from 66 to 64, highlighting a widening gap between anti-corruption standards, their enforcement, and the integrity of those in power. Hindering the blocs response to the current geopolitical and economic context.

LinkedInX
CF

Center for the Study of Democracy

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

The Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD) is a European public policy institute based in Sofia, Bulgaria, with almost thirty years of continuous anti-corruption research, monitoring and policy engagement at national, European and global level.

LinkedInX
SC

Stop Corruption Foundation

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

Nadácia Zastavme korupciu (Stop Corruption Foundation) is an independent Slovak watchdog focused on investigating corruption, protecting whistleblowers, legislative advocacy and integrity education. We welcome the EU Anti-Corruption Strategy and submit evidence from Slovakia, 20242026 the clearest current example of how quickly anti-corruption capacity can be dismantled, and proof that EU instruments can reverse…

LinkedInX
IE

IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it

· · filed 6 Jul 2026 · source

Corruption affects the EU’s security and economy, undermines public trust, erodes the rule of law and facilitates organised crime. The new EU anti-corruption strategy aims to better protect our democracy and, in particular: prevent, detect and fight corruption, within and outside the EU, close loopholes, strengthen oversight and increase transparency build a culture of integrity across the EU.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FX

Future x2

· · filed 4 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

I am an experienced consultant specialised in procurement and supply chain transformation at global corporations manufacturing products in consumer goods and healthcare. I am convinced that corruption destroys countries and their people enormously, much more than we assume: including trust, confidence and reliance on authorities, even in well developed countries, unfortunately.

LinkedInX
L

Letzpact

· · filed 3 Jul 2026 · source

Letzpact, the Luxembourg Public Affairs Community, welcomes the European Commission's future Anti-Corruption Strategy. Corruption undermines trust in public institutions, weakens the rule of law, distorts fair competition and erodes democratic legitimacy. Addressing these challenges requires a coherent European approach based on integrity, transparency and accountability.

LinkedInX
EH

Eunoia Horizons s.r.o.

· · filed 2 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

The Commission is right to see the far-reaching dangers of corruption. This comment will highlight three main points. First, policies must be enforced consistently over time to reach the Commissions desired outcome. Second, the loss of revenue to corruption is significant and real. Finally, the Commission should strengthen and expand the European Public Prosecutors Office (EPPO) to enforce these measures. 1.

LinkedInX
LG

Luiss Guido Carli University

· · filed 1 Jul 2026 · source

PDF

Feedback Evidence Base from the BridgeGap Horizon Project Submitted by the BridgeGap Horizon Europe consortium. Contact: Prof. [name removed], Principal Investigator, [email removed]. Evidence tools: www.corruptiondata.eu; www.corruptionrisk.org; www.europam.eu.

LinkedInX
UO

University of Glasgow

· · filed 30 Jun 2026 · source

PDF

This submission draws on Work Package 4 of the BridgeGap project, a Horizon Europe-funded study of how organisations actually fail at integrity, not just how they are regulated. Rather than offering general commentary on the proposed Directive, it translates five real-world breakdowns spanning defence, infrastructure, healthcare, sports and banking into eight concrete recommendations the Strategy could adopt.

LinkedInX
UO

University of Glasgow

· · filed 30 Jun 2026 · source

PDF

This policy brief asks a different question than most anti-corruption policy. It analyse whether organisations have integrity systems, but whether those systems are balanced. Drawing on five major European scandals, including Leonardos bribery allegations, the UK Post Office Horizon prosecutions, Novartis Hellas, the Belgian football match-fixing case, and Nordeas money-laundering failures, this document shows a…

LinkedInX
F

FIBGAR

· · filed 30 Jun 2026 · source

The EU Anti-Corruption Strategy should be built on three pillars: Pillar 1 Civic participation in monitoring. Participation must be built into the architecture, not bolted on as an afterthought. Corruption persists in part because those closest to it- communities, journalists, local organisations- have no formal channel through which their observations reach enforcement bodies.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 45 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.