NGO · Croatia · EU Transparency Register 180972127836-49
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #363 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.7
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since
Declares membership of
More information here: https://gong.hr/en/ and http://www.gong.hr/en/about-gong/what-is-gong/
ENEMO - The European Network of Election Monitoring Organizations
ALTER-EU - The Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation
ECF - European Civic Forum
OGP – Open Government Partnership
UNCAC The UN Convention against Corruption Civil Society Coalition
EDRi - European Digital Rights
Transparency CEE - Technology for Transparency and Accountability in CEE and Eurasia
Platform 112 for the rule of law and human rights in Croatia
The GOOD Initiative for the introduction of systematic and high-quality education for human rights and democratic cit…
CROSOL - Croatian Platform for International Citizen Solidarity
ADMO - Adriatic Digital Media Observatory
and 5 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Zagreb, Croatia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Today, young people grow up in societies where they strengthen extreme political options that challenge the fundamental values of liberal democracy. Trust in democratic institutions is declining, and we are increasingly exposed to hate speech, violence, historical revisionism and misinformation circulated, most often on social media used by young people as main sources of information.
Filed in Croatian · English published by the European Commission
Gong considers that only the Supreme Court, as the highest court of the Republic of Croatia, can rule on conflicts of jurisdiction between the DORH and the EPPO, which would also be in line with the EPPO Regulation.
Filed in Croatian · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Gong’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.