Transparency International joins the Public Consultation on Draft Implementing Regulation for Open Data Directive and calls on the Commission to act on the promise to include a requirement to open company information. Now as the EU Commission drafts the Implementing Regulation, it is troublesome that only basic company information and company documents are considered for open publication.
Transparency International EU
NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 501222919-71
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #221 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Transparency International EU is part of the Transparency International movement, the global civil society organisati…
- Transparency International is a global network including more than 100 locally established national chapters and chap…
- Transparency International as a global movement works with a large number of other actors on specific aspects – natio…
- Transparency International EU is a member of:
- UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) Civil Society Coalition - https://uncaccoalition.org/
- Finance Watch - https://www.finance-watch.org/
- Civil Society Europe - https://civilsocietyeurope.eu/
- European Policy Centre - https://epc.eu/en/
- Whistleblowing International Network - https://whistleblowingnetwork.org/Home
- Open Spending EU Coalition - https://www.open-spending.eu/
- People vs Big tech - https://peoplevsbig.tech/
- Climate Action Against Disinformation (CAAD) - https://caad.info/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Transparency International Liaison Office to the European Union (TI EU)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Transparency in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Transparency International EU? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Transparency International EU filed 7 positions between 6 Apr 2021 and 6 Jul 2026, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
What they argued
Transparency International EU is participating in this public consultation on the Open Data Directive, with respect to the list of high value datasets a set out in the Implementing Regulation. Recalling that European Parliament and the Council agreed in 2019 to add “Companies and Company Ownership” data to the list, we would like to draw attention to the current proposal of only providing basic company information…
Progress in tackling corruption across the EU has stalled over the past decade. The regions average score in the 2025 CPI has declined from 66 to 64, highlighting a widening gap between anti-corruption standards, their enforcement, and the integrity of those in power. Hindering the blocs response to the current geopolitical and economic context.
Transparency International, together with our Brussels office Transparency International EU, are pleased to submit feedback on the draft Implementing Regulation on the formats for the submission of beneficial ownership information to the Member States central registers.
1) Remark concerning the legal basis The chosen legal basis for EU action in the field of the fight against corruption is Article 83 of the TFEU, which concerns criminal matters. While corruption should indeed be treated as a serious crime, accompanied by appropriate sanctions, we would like to highlight that only Article 83 TFEU as a legal basis can be very limiting.
Transparency International EU (TI EU) believes that the ongoing evolution of the EU Anti-Fraud Architecture (AFA) presents a crucial opportunity to strengthen the protection of the Unions financial interests through greater cooperation, and institutional coherence between key anti-fraud actors, notably the European Public Prosecutors Office (EPPO) and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).
Transparency International EU (TI-EU) welcomes the incept impact assessment and the issues identified with regards to Directive 2014/42/EU (Directive) and supports policy option 3. In particular, TI EU recommends the following reforms: Problem 1: The criminal offences included under the Directive should be aligned with that of Directive on Combating Money Laundering by Criminal Law 2018.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Transparency International EU next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Transparency International EU’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.