Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
CAS

Czech Academy of Sciences

Academic / research · Czechia

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Czech in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Czech Academy of Sciences? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Czech Academy of Sciences engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from Czech Academy of Sciences or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Czech Academy of Sciences filed 3 positions between 1 Jul 2025 and 6 Jul 2026, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed

What they argued

EU Fusion Strategyfiled 1 Jul 2025source

The Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS) operates a complex of 54 research institutions in the Czech Republic. The primary mission of the CAS and its institutes is to conduct research in a broad spectrum of the natural, technical and social sciences and the humanities. Many of the CAS research institutes are active in the fusion related research.

EU anti-corruption strategyfiled 6 Jul 2026PDFsource

The Czech Academy of Sciences welcomes the European Commissions initiative to develop a comprehensive EU Anti-Corruption Strategy. Directive (EU) 2026/1021 provides a common legal framework; the Strategy should complement it by supporting coherent implementation, cooperation, reliable evidence and measurable results, while avoiding duplication.

Evaluation of EU rules for users of genetic resources and the sharing of benefits arising from their utilizationfiled 4 Feb 2026PDFsource

We welcome the opportunity to contribute to the evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 and fully support the objectives of the Nagoya Protocol. Based on long-term non-commercial biodiversity research conducted in close cooperation with partner institutions in biodiversity-rich developing countries, we observe that the current implementation of the EU ABS Regulation creates significant practical barriers to…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Czech Academy of Sciences’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.