Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
UNE

UNESID

Industry association · Spain · EU Transparency Register 44209611834-88

12
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
11
legislative files
of 326 tracked
9
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #105 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2009
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • Eurofer, the European Steel Association
  • ESTA, European Steel Tubes Association
  • CIELFFA, the European Association of cold rolled narrow strip
  • ESTEP, The European Steel Technology Platform
  • Euroslag, the association of organisations and companies concerned with the manufacture and utilisation of slag products
  • CEOE, la Confederación española de organizaciones empresariales
  • UNE, la Asociación española de normalización

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Trade and business associations
Registered as
Unión de Empresas Siderúrgicas (UNESID)
Head office
Madrid, Spain

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track UNESID in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at UNESID? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files UNESID engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 11 files, from UNESID or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

UNESID filed 12 positions between 17 Feb 2022 and 12 Aug 2026, across 11 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 9 times.

2022 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed2025 · 4 filed2026 · 6 filed

What they argued

Revision of EU rules on public procurementfiled 26 Jan 2026PDFsource

The revision of the EU public procurement framework represents an important opportunity to further develop procurement practices that support the green transition, industrial competitiveness and economic resilience, while ensuring value for money.

Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)filed 21 Jul 2023PDFsource

The Spanish Steel Association, UNESID, in representation of the Spanish Steel Industry welcomes the opportunity to give feedback on the initiative which aims to define a framework to regulate and harmonize the environmental claims and, as a result, to boost the participation and empowerment of costumer in the ecological transition through the disposal of accurate and comparable environmental information for their…

Revision of the benchmark values for free allocation of emission allowances (2026-2030)filed 8 Jun 2026PDFsource

Contribution of UNESID Spanish Steelmaking and Steel Transforming Association UNESID welcomes the opportunity to comment on the draft Commission Implementing Regulation revising the ETS benchmark values for free allocation in 2026-2030. The full UNESID position is attached as an annex. This summary focuses on one issue: the proposed fuel fallback benchmark.

EU taxonomy - review of the climate delegated actfiled 14 Apr 2026PDFsource

UNESID, the Spanish Steel Association, welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2486. Our comments on specific provisions of the draft acts are set out in the attached document.

Carbon price paid in a third country under the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM)filed 25 Sept 2025PDFsource

Carbon price paid in third countries. A fair and detailed view is needed. UNESID supports the principle that CBAM should recognise carbon prices already paid abroad, but this must be applied with extreme caution. Our main concerns are: 1. Only net, effective carbon costs. Recognition should be limited to explicit and verifiable CO prices that apply equally to all domestic producers in the exporting country.

Road vehicles: maximum weights and dimensionsfiled 17 Feb 2022source

Unesid, representing the steel and first steel processing industry, supports the increase in the maximum mass of lorries to 44 tonnes and the free transit between Member States of vehicles of this tonnage. There are several reasons for this: On the one hand, climate efficiency: each journey by which the load carried increases from the current approximately 22 t in different MSs to 26 t represents a very significant…

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

Carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) methodology for the definitive periodfiled 25 Sept 2025PDFsource

CBAM Methodology (definitive period from 2026) UNESID values the opportunity to comment on the CBAM methodology. We believe several elements require clarification or reinforcement: 1. Melted and poured + mechanical transformation. CBAM must require proof of the plant where the steel was melted and poured, complemented with information on subsequent thermo-mechanical transformation (rolling, coating, etc.).

EU aluminium sector – trade measure to ensure sufficient availability of aluminium scrap on the EU marketfiled 30 Jan 2026source

The Commissions initiative to ensure sufficient availability of aluminium scrap within the EU is fully consistent with the Unions renewed approach to economic security, industrial resilience and the effective implementation of the circular economy, in line with the objectives of the Steel and Metals Action Plan and the EU agenda to safeguard strategic inputs for the green and digital transitions.

Adjustment of the obligation to surrender CBAM certificates to take account of ETS free allowances phase-outfiled 25 Sept 2025PDFsource

CBAM Benchmarks (ETS references) CBAM Benchmarks should reflect the best environmental practices and reducing the risk of circumvention. UNESID welcomes the Commissions consultation on CBAM benchmarks. We agree that benchmarks must reflect the principles of the ETS, ensuring both environmental integrity and a fair level playing field. However, several points deserve stronger emphasis: 1.

Ecodesign requirements for iron and steel productsfiled 12 Aug 2026PDFsource

See ESPR Iron and Steel Questionnaire UNESID Final including rational v4 Harmonised definition of \"green steel\". Methodological Principles [1] agreed by UNESID partners UNESID Low-carbon steel labelling reference values EN v4 (non-paper) The three documents has been integrated in the first one in a row.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 382.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from UNESID’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.