Outokumpu comments the planned Circular Economy Act The circular economy is advancing, but more encouraging examples of its business models are needed. Achieving a true circular economy requires well-functioning markets. We support the general purpose of the planned Act, as it will facilitate the free movement of circular products, secondary raw materials and waste.
Outokumpu
Company · Finland · EU Transparency Register 085686030231-69
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #62 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- Eurofer →
- Euro Alliages →
- Eurometaux →
- Euro Slag
- European Institute of Innovation and Technology
- European Steel Technology Platform
- ICDA
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- Outokumpu Oyj (Outokumpu)
- Head office
- Helsinki, Finland
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Outokumpu in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Outokumpu? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Outokumpu filed 8 positions between 25 Sept 2025 and 24 Jul 2026, across 8 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 7 times.
What they argued
A mandatory EU origin requirement for steel and stainless steel is a necessary and proportionate measure to safeguard fair competition, reinforce EU trade policy, and support Europes strategic autonomy. It ensures that public procurement drives demand for low carbon, EU produced materials rather than subsidizing imported emissions.
Outokumpu supports the idea that the revision of the EUs current public procurement rules will allow for sustainability, resilience and European preference criteria in EU public procurement for strategic sectors.
Outokumpu welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the draft revision of benchmark values for free allocation under the EU ETS for the 20262030 period. As a global leader in lowcarbon stainless steel, Outokumpu supports the principle of regularly updating EU ETS benchmarks based on real performance data, in line with technological progress and with the overarching goal of meeting the EUs climate goals.
The deduction for the carbon price paid in the country of origin plays an important role in the equation calculating the final CBAM costs. In order to ensure the environmental integrity of the CBAM and its effectiveness in ensuring a level playing field for European producers, it is essential that a very cautious and conservative approach is adopted in recognising the carbon price in the country of origin.
Outokumpu strongly supports a robust and predictable EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) as a cornerstone of Europes climate policy and industrial competitiveness, generating economic growth and employment in Europe. We welcome the Commissions commitment to the climate targets for carbon neutrality by 2050 and at least 90% greenhouse gas emission reduction by 2040.
The CBAM benchmarks are meant to reflect the level of free allocation granted to European industry in order to ensure an effective carbon leakage protection and a level playing field with importers. Therefore, they play a major role in the calculation of the CBAM obligation, since they are discounted from the total costs of embedded emissions.
The Centre should become Europe's central platform for monitoring global raw material markets, identifying emerging supply risks and supporting coordinated action to strengthen resilience. Its analytical function should provide continuous monitoring of supply-demand developments, identify bottlenecks across value chains and support diversification of supply sources.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 7 files in common
- Bellona Europa · 7 files in common
- ECOS · 6 files in common
- Norsk Hydro · 6 files in common
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 5 files in common
Showing 5 of 389.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Outokumpu’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.