Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

WE
Wild Europe

NGO · Netherlands

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
CEP
Cepi

Industry association · Belgium

16
files engaged
of 583 tracked
20
positions filed
in those 583 files
6.8
declared FTE
self-declared
12
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: under €10K a year · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Monitoring framework for resilient European forests · Illegal logging – evaluation of EU rules (fitness check)

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Monitoring framework for resilient European forests

Wild Europe · filed 6 May 2022 · source

Trustworthy information about the status and utilisation of forests, such as the recent MAES report by JRC , are key for responsible decision making. Without the existence of good quality, consistent and available data, policy and financial decision makers cannot make informed decisions. However, the current datasets are far from being consistent.

Cepi · filed 6 May 2022 · source

Cepi welcomes the opportunity to provide early feedback on the initiative to develop an EU-wide forest observation framework to provide open access to information on the condition and management of EU forests. Fostering the knowledge base on the availability of forest resources with socio-economic indicators and science-based data on biodiversity is an important element for developing sound and evidence-based…

Cepi · filed 5 Feb 2024 · source

Cepi welcomes and encourages all efforts to further increase the knowledge base on European forests and forest resources, and to improve the quality (including timeliness of information), accuracy and comparability of forest related data available at the EU-level. Improving the knowledge and factual database about European forests is the first necessary step to address the challenges that come with climate change.

Illegal logging – evaluation of EU rules (fitness check)

Wild Europe · filed 19 Feb 2020 · source

The EUTR was a good step into the right direction, but there are at least three elements, which require further improvement (a) the annex of the legislation must be all inclusive to cover all forest related products. This is going to be even more relevant if the EU pushes the implementation of the BioEconomy strategy further.

Cepi · filed 27 Feb 2020 · source

The European paper and board industries welcome the upcoming fitness check to evaluate the key legal instruments of the FLEGT Action Plan, namely the FLEGT Regulation and EUTR. Legally sourced, certified primary raw materials from sustainably managed forests are prerequisite for the European paper and board industry. EUTR helps to secure legal sourcing of products sold on the European market.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.