The following recommendations are collated from our partnership network, including our conferences in Brussels (2017) which produced an Old Growth Forest Protection Strategy and Bratislava (2019): 1) Defining areas for protection • A clear definition structure for old growth and primary forest, identifying relevant criteria, to enable a standardised approach for protection & restoration; to be set alongside varying…
WE
WILD EUROPE
NGO · Hungary
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track WILD in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at WILD EUROPE? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
WILD EUROPE filed 4 positions between 19 Feb 2020 and 6 May 2022, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2020 · 3 filed2022 · 1 filed
What they argued
The following recommendations are collated from our partnership network, including inputs from our Bratislava conference: 1) General principles • Restoration of degraded natural ecosystems is essential, though protection of existing ecosystems (particularly forest) should be highlighted as more cost-effective. A point often overlooked.
Trustworthy information about the status and utilisation of forests, such as the recent MAES report by JRC , are key for responsible decision making. Without the existence of good quality, consistent and available data, policy and financial decision makers cannot make informed decisions. However, the current datasets are far from being consistent.
The EUTR was a good step into the right direction, but there are at least three elements, which require further improvement (a) the annex of the legislation must be all inclusive to cover all forest related products. This is going to be even more relevant if the EU pushes the implementation of the BioEconomy strategy further.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put WILD EUROPE next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 34.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from WILD EUROPE’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.