The ZAW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposal of the EU Commission for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on transparency and targeting of political advertising. As the overall representative of the advertising industry in Germany, the ZAW represents the interests of advertising companies, trade, media, advertising agencies as well as the advertising professions and market…
2021/0381(COD) · In Force
Transparency and targeting of political advertising
16 submissions from 14 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 164 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 16 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
- Published in the Official Journal · 20 Mar 2024
- Adoption of the legislative act · 20 Mar 2024
- Signed · 13 Mar 2024
- Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 11 Mar 2024
- Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 6 Mar 2024
Who showed up
8 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 5 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 1.6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 31 Jan 2022 — it ran from 25 Nov 2021.
- Policy area
- Justice (DG JUST)
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Legislative stage
- In Force
- Lead committee
- IMCO
- Rapporteur
- Sandro Gozi (Renew)
- Procedure
- 2021/0381(COD)
- Commission reference
- COM(2021)731
How it got here
- Impact assess incep23 Feb 2021
- Public consultation2 Apr 2021
- Proposal for a regulation31 Jan 2022
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.
Showing 16 of 16 submissions.
The European Advertising Standards Alliance (EASA) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and targeting of political advertising, as adopted by the European Commission, ahead of the discussions in the European Parliament and in the Council.
ACT - Association of Commercial Television and Video on Demand Services in Europe
· · filed 31 Jan 2022 · source
Scope, instrument, proportionality. We welcome the intent to address untransparent political advertising and its effects on the democratic process. In line with stated goals and impact assessment of the initiative, we see that the internal market issues are essentially tied to the online sphere; traditional political advertising in the media, where it is legal, being largely circumscribed to the national level and…
CCIA Europe
· · filed 31 Jan 2022 · source
At the end of 2021, the European Commission proposed new rules on transparency and targeting of political advertising to protect democratic elections. Political ads help connect politicians with their constituents and potential voters. Lawmakers want EU citizens to clearly see when they receive a political advert, who sponsored it and why.
Online political advertising is a relatively new phenomenon that has not been thoroughly regulated - a regulatory gap which threatens electoral integrity through voter manipulation, opaque campaigning and disinformation campaigns, as shown by the Cambridge Analytica scandal and recent whistle-blowers’ testimony.
Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego
· · filed 31 Jan 2022 · source
The Foundation welcomes the fact that the European Commission has begun work on regulating the transparency of political advertising on the Internet. The content of the draft presented for consultation is also to be welcomed. However, attention should be drawn to certain solutions which are missing in the draft or need to be supplemented. The draft itself introduces a definition of political advertising.
We welcome the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposal for a Regulation on the transparency and targeting of political advertising, as adopted by the European Commission, ahead of the discussions in the European Parliament and in the Council. We kindly invite everyone to read our full submission in the attachment.
The enclosed document with feedback draws on SNV’s previous work on online political advertising (https://www.stiftung-nv.de/en/publication/rules-fair-digital-campaigning) and on defining political advertising (https://www.stiftung-nv.de/en/publication/defining-online-political-advertising). It includes input from colleagues from SNV as well as other think tank and civil society representatives.
Citoyenne Francaise (et non "citoyenne européenne" qui n'existe pas)
· · filed 26 Nov 2021 · source
Hello, it would be useful to make more transparency than the appointment of judges to the ECHR, 25 % of whose last cases have been judged in a situation of conflict of interest. These conflicts of interest are mostly due to the fact that “judges” come from militant NGOs who do not represent nobody and surely not the citizens of EU countries. Many are financed by Georges Soros with political objectives.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
We thank the Commission for the opportunity to submit feedback to the Inception Impact Assessment on the “Proposal for an initiative on greater transparency in sponsored political content, and other supporting measures.” We invite everyone to read our full submission in the attachment.
The European Publishers Council (EPC) appreciates the opportunity given by the European Commission to submit our views on the inception impact assessment for Political Advertising. We support the Commission’s main objectives as set out in the European Democracy Action Plan, and the proposed ancillary measures such as the Regulation of Political Advertising.
EACA welcomes the possibility to provide feedback on the European Commission’s roadmap on political advertising . EACA fully supports the overall objective of the initiative, which has also been laid out in the political guidelines of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, notably to “ensure greater transparency on paid political advertising” .
The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) supports the European Democracy Action Plan and its goal to provide more transparency in political advertising and to safeguard election integrity, freedom of expression, and media pluralism.
GISAD welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to increase transparency in political advertising and communication. GISAD does not see it as its task to express its views on the harmonisation and simplification of legislation.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS
· · filed 22 Feb 2021 · source
Centre for Public Policy PROVIDUS (think-tank based in Latvia) on Thursday, February 18, 2021, organized a workshop for Latvian political parties, experts and state institutions on European Commission's inception impact assessment regarding transparency of political advertising.
Belgische Associatie for Mensenrechten en Ontwikkeling
· · filed 30 Jan 2021 · source
Transparency of electoral advertising and external interference Social media is important to realize the importance of electoral political propaganda, as it is a media attempt to influence people's attitudes, opinions, and behavior, and its means is to spread information, facts, half-facts, or even lies in an organized attempt to influence public opinion.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.