Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EPD

European Partnership for Democracy

NGO · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 679535014238-83

5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 665 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #275 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2014
in the register since

Declares membership of

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track European in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow European Partnership for Democracy

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at European Partnership for Democracy? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

European Partnership for Democracy filed 5 positions between 31 Mar 2021 and 23 Jan 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.

2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Public Procurement Actfiled 23 Jan 2026PDFsource

The European Partnership for Democracy (EPD) welcomes the forthcoming revision of the EU public procurement framework and the opportunity to contribute to this consultation. The objectives outlined in the call for evidence, in particular the ambition to strengthen social outcomes, improve efficiency, enhance transparency and better align procurement with wider EU policy goals, are closely aligned with the added…

Digital Services Actfiled 31 Mar 2021PDFsource

Transparency of advertising Online advertising drives excessive data collection, personal data abuse and intrusive targeting. In addition to the large-scale privacy breaches that continue to escape GDPR enforcement, this situation has led to the manipulation of democratic elections and the distortion of online public debate around the world.

Transparency and targeting of political advertisingfiled 31 Jan 2022PDFsource

Online political advertising is a relatively new phenomenon that has not been thoroughly regulated - a regulatory gap which threatens electoral integrity through voter manipulation, opaque campaigning and disinformation campaigns, as shown by the Cambridge Analytica scandal and recent whistle-blowers’ testimony.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put European Partnership for Democracy next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 132.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from European Partnership for Democracy’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.