Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2020/0365(COD) · In Force

Resilience of critical entities

43 submissions from 38 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 61 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 43 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

28 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 28 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 28Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 14

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

18 of 38
in the EU Register
124
full-time lobbying staff
€25.9M+
declared costs a year
99
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 8 Apr 2021 — it ran from 16 Dec 2020.

Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Commission reference
COM(2020)829

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep7 Aug 2020
  2. Prop dir8 Apr 2021

Showing 25 of 43 submissions.

HP

H2020 PEN-CP project

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

1) PEN-CP suggestions for direct edits and additions to the draft directive 1.1 Given all the background explained below (2), we consider customs as a “critical entity” that is responsible for providing “essential services” for society. We therefore propose that Customs would play a role in the Critical Entities Resilience Groups. (Directive draft page 23).

LinkedInX
D

DIGITALEUROPE

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

The changing nature of the threat landscape requires better protection and more investment in the EU’s resilience capacities to secure our critical infrastructure. DIGITALEUROPE welcomes the Commission’s effort to strengthen the resilience of critical entities across the EU by developing and updating relevant legislation.

LinkedInX
ES

Enagás, S.A.

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

As regards the Directive, Enagás would like to send the following messages: • “In order to verify compliance with the Directive, control mechanisms (inspections, monitoring, audits, request for information...) shall be put in place” — > Certification in certain international regulations related to resilience should be taken into account as evidence of such compliance in order to reduce the administrative burden on…

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RN

RIPE NCC

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

The RIPE NCC has contributed to the development of the Internet in Europe for nearly thirty years and provides a number of technical services that support the functioning of the global Internet, including operating one of the world’s 13 global DNS root servers (K-root) and acting as the Regional Internet Registry for Europe.

LinkedInX
MG

MOL Group

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

MOL Group’s draft input to critical infrastructures roadmap consultation: Critical infrastructures and their special management to avoid risks related to economy and all citizens is an important area, where there is a need for harmonized EU approach.

LinkedInX
EP

Euroheat & Power

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

Euroheat & Power welcomes the European Commission’s proposal to improve the protection of ‘critical entities’ in the EU and is grateful for the opportunity to provide feedback. The Directive 2008/114/EC on critical infrastructure is providing a focus which is too narrow and some provisions/definitions which are too general to address in an effective manner the rapidly changing picture of systemic risks faced by…

LinkedInX
E

Enedis

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

Enedis, the main electricity DSO in France, operating 95% of the French territory, warmly welcomes the European Commission’s proposal. The current ECI Directive is no longer adapted to new threats and increased interdependencies between different sectors.

LinkedInX
F

FEDENE

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the resilience of critical entities FEDENE’s contribution FEDENE is a French professional association representing 500 energy and environmental service companies.

LinkedInX
GE

GIRP - European Healthcare Distribution Association

· · filed 8 Apr 2021 · source

GIRP welcomes the Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities and the harmonisation purpose it serves to apply a uniform approach in identifying critical entities, while also accounting for specificities at national level, including varying levels of risk exposure and interdependencies between sectors and over borders.

LinkedInX
E

ENGIE

· · filed 7 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

ENGIE Group’s response to the public consultation on the proposal for a directive on the resilience of critical entities ENGIE welcomes the proposal of the European Commission for a directive on the resilience of critical entities, as ENGIE is particularly involved in the subject as member of the ad hoc steering committee of OECD.

LinkedInX
EO

European Organisation for Security

· · filed 7 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

The European Organisation for Security (EOS), as the representative of the European Industrial and Research Security Community, welcomes the Commission initiative of renewing an EU approach to Critical Infrastructure protection.

LinkedInX
ME

McKesson Europe

· · filed 7 Apr 2021 · source

McKesson Europe welcomes the Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities. The ongoing COVID-19 crisis has demonstrated the need for a strong and coordinated critical infrastructure at national level to ensure rapid and effective intervention in the event of cross-border health threats and future pandemics.

LinkedInX
B

Bitkom

· · filed 7 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

Bitkom agrees that the existing framework for protecting critical infrastructures is inadequate in the light of increasing interdependencies and evolving risks. The changing nature of the threat landscape requires both better protection and more investment in resilience capacities to secure our critical infrastructure.

LinkedInX
EO

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL)

· · filed 7 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

EUROCONTROL Corporate Security Service welcomes the initiative from DG HOME to provide feedback on the proposal for a new directive on the resilience of critical entities. EUROCONTROL Corporate Security Service supports the scope enlargement in terms of sectors, risks and mitigation measures foreseen in this proposal compared to the 2008/114/EC directive.

LinkedInX
BB

BDI – Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie e.V.

· · filed 7 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

As the voice of German industry, BDI highly appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commission’s proposal for a Directive on the Resilience of Critical Entities (COM(2020) 829). German industry welcomes the European Commission’s aim to strengthen the resilience of critical entities in the Member States and to further level the playing field for critical entities across the European Union.

LinkedInX
MC

Microsoft Corporation

· · filed 6 Apr 2021 · source

PDF

Microsoft welcomes the 2020 CER Directive proposal and kindly uses this consultation to share its views on the proposal with the European Commission. We are currently witnessing and experiencing an increase in attacks against digital critical infrastructures.

LinkedInX
UK

UP KRITIS

· · filed 31 Mar 2021 · source

PDF

UP KRITIS is a private-public partnership of operators of essential services (OES) and public authorities. This statement is the result of the business representatives (OES) in UP KRITIS , who welcome the EU project but give some points to consider. 1.

LinkedInX
BH

ÖBB-Holding AG

· · filed 20 Jan 2021 · source

- Protection of critical infrastructure is a sovereign task. - To ensure the international continuity/usability of critical infrastructure in the event of a crisis, an overarching European concept is needed to protect it. Europe-wide cooperation is indispensable in the implementation of this concept.

LinkedInX
BT

Bombardier Transportation

· · filed 7 Aug 2020 · source

PDF

Bombardier Transportation welcomes the European Commission’s determination to improve the protection of critical infrastructure in the EU and is grateful for the opportunity to provide feedback on this roadmap, towards new legislative proposals for measures to enhance the protection and resilience of critical infrastructure.

LinkedInX
HP

H2020 project IN-PREP (GA number 740627)

· · filed 7 Aug 2020 · source

This feedback is provided as coordinator of the H2020 project IN-PREP (GA number 740627). More info about the project can be found here: https://www.in-prep.eu/ Transboundary crises pose a specific set of complex challenges for which Europe is – despite recent policy initiatives (e.g. Decision No 1313/2013/EU) – still ill prepared.

LinkedInX
HP

H2020 project Ingenious (GA number 833435)

· · filed 7 Aug 2020 · source

This feedback is provided as coordinator of the H2020 project Ingenious (GA number 833435). More info about the project can be found here: https://ingenious-first-responders.eu/ Europe remains vulnerable to a wide range of natural and manmade hazards (such as flood, earthquake, industrial accidents, terrorism, critical infrastructure losses, etc.), with disasters causing tremendous repercussions in human life and…

LinkedInX
HP

H2020 project Cyber-MAR (GA number 833389)

· · filed 7 Aug 2020 · source

This feedback is provided as coordinator of the H2020 project Cyber-MAR (GA number 833389) - www.cyber-mar.eu/ Protection of Critical infrastructure becomes today a complex issue with an urgent need to cover physical, cyber and hybrid threats as well.

LinkedInX

This opinion on the Inception Impact Assessment is issued by the Secretariat-General for Defence and National Security (SGDSN) in its capacity as Critical Infrastructure Protection Point of Contact (CIP POC) and does not commit the official position of France, which will be the subject of in-depth interministerial consultations in the coming months.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
MG

MOL Group

· · filed 7 Aug 2020 · source

MOL Group’s input to critical infrastructures roadmap consultation Critical infrastructures and their special management to avoid risks related to economy and all citizens is an important area, where there is a need for harmonized EU approach.

LinkedInX
HF

H2020 FINSEC project consortium

· · filed 7 Aug 2020 · source

H2020 FINSEC Comments on the CIP Directive Following paragraphs provide the H2020 FINSEC project’s feedback on the DG HOME’s Recent CIP Directive titled: “Proposal for measures to enhance the protection and resilience of critical infrastructure”. FINSEC is developing and validating a platform for Cyber-Physical Threat Intelligence (CPTI) that targets the protection of critical infrastructures of the finance sector.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 43 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.