The business representatives of the German KRITIS Implementation Partnership (UP KRITIS), a public-private partnership between operators of critical infrastructures and the relevant authorities with more than 1000 member organizations in Germany, want to give feedback to the 4 main topics in the revision of the Cyber Security Act (CSA2) in the attached position paper 1. Expanded ENISA Mandate 2.
UP KRITIS
NGO · Germany
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track UP in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at UP KRITIS? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
UP KRITIS filed 3 positions between 18 Mar 2021 and 1 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
What they argued
The members of UP KRITIS (Public Private Partnership of the German Critical Infrastructure Managers) welcomed the revision of the NIS Directive 2.0. With a view to increasing network and information security in the European internal market in an effective and cost-effective manner, we would like to draw attention to the following possible improvements to the Commission’s legislative proposal of 16.12.2020 and ask it…
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
UP KRITIS is a private-public partnership of operators of essential services (OES) and public authorities. This statement is the result of the business representatives (OES) in UP KRITIS , who welcome the EU project but give some points to consider. 1.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put UP KRITIS next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 39.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from UP KRITIS’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.