UNIDEN welcomes the possibility of giving its feedback on the draft Commission implementing regulation on the EU ETS benchmark values for the period 2026-2030. The draft values of the product-specific benchmarks seem, in most but not all of the cases, consistent with the expectations of the sectors covered by EU ETS.
UNIDEN
Industry association · France
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track UNIDEN in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at UNIDEN? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
UNIDEN filed 8 positions between 9 Jan 2025 and 10 Jun 2026, across 7 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
1. The contribution of renewable and low-carbon energy sources with a latted EU 2040 climate target for 2040 must first and foremost be based on an effective and measurable reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. The European framework should therefore be based on all decarbonised, renewable and low-carbon energy sources, which make a tangible contribution to reducing emissions.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
The robustness of CBAM depends on the strict equivalence between the carbon costs borne by EU producers and those applied to imports. The implementing rules on the recognition of carbon price paid in third countries must therefore ensure consistency, transparency and comparability across jurisdictions in order to preserve both environmental integrity and fair competition.
To ensure a level playing field for European producers, it is essential that a very cautious and conservative approach was adopted in recognizing the carbon price in the country of origin. When crediting emissions trading in third countries, the local CO2 price is not a sufficient indicator to assess the real CO2 cost bare by the importers.
For the determination of the embedded emissions, the scope should remain only on direct emissions, including those linked to the heat generation.We recommend not extending CBAM scope to indirect emissions for industries that are already covered by the EU ETS Indirect Carbon Cost Compensation Scheme. Due to the marginal pricing system of power in Europe, power prices are affected by the price of CO2 allowances.
1. Energy efficiency must help decarbonise Europe’s latent climate target economy by 2040, and above all it must be based on an effective and measurable reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, in line with the pathway towards carbon neutrality.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Specifically on the methodology, the CBAM product benchmarks shall be defined by using a similar methodology to the one used for determining the EU ETS product benchmarks. The benchmark scope shall take into account process emissions, direct emissions linked to energy consumption and, where relevant, indirect emissions linked to purchased heat.
Monitoring and Reporting Complexity The new rules defined in article 5 and annex I add considerable complexity in terms of monitoring and reporting. For installations with heat BM and/or fuel BM sub-installation with several products (under the same PRODCOM code or not), but with differing energy intensities per product the changes proposed could lead to significant administrative burden and substantial additional…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Bellona Europa · 6 files in common
- Solvay SA · 6 files in common
- Cefic · 5 files in common
- ECOS · 5 files in common
- IFIEC-Europe · 5 files in common
Showing 5 of 205.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from UNIDEN’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.