Fastighetsägarna welcomes the European Commissions ambition to establish a Circular Economy Act as part of the Clean Industrial Deal. The property and construction sector supports this transition but stresses that circularity must be built on value creation, prevention and market functionality, not on new administrative layers or overlapping quota systems.
FG
Fastighetsägarna
Industry association · Sweden · EU Transparency Register 777919433502-35
4
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #408 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.3
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€10K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2018
in the register since
Declares membership of
- UIPI https://www.uipi.com/
- European Real Estate Forum http://www.europeanrealestateforum.eu/
- EPRA https://www.epra.com/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- Swedish Property Federation (SPF)
- Head office
- Stockholm, Sweden
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Fastighetsägarna in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Fastighetsägarna? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Fastighetsägarna filed 4 positions between 3 Oct 2025 and 9 Apr 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2025 · 3 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Summary of our key comments (also see attached file) We have no objections to the proposed amendments where no specific comments are provided below. For activity 7.1, we highlight the lack of robust reference data for life-cycle GWP calculations and request clarification of the purpose and scope of on demand disclosure.
Fastighetsägarna welcomes the Commissions initiative to develop an Electrification Action Plan. As property owners, we represent a key sector that both consumes and enables electrification through buildings. We fully share the objective of increasing cost-effective, system-friendly and competitive electrification. Against this background, we would like to highlight the following points: 1.
Fastighetsägarna welcomes the Commissions initiative to develop a Heating and Cooling Strategy. We would like to highlight the following points: 1. Stronger consumer protection in district heating monopolies ensures affordability and competitiveness. District heating is a natural monopoly in most Member States. Consumers cannot change supplier, which requires stronger protection than currently in place.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- EDF - Electricité de France · 4 files in common
- EuroCommerce · 4 files in common
- European Biogas Association · 4 files in common
- ESWET - European Suppliers of Waste-to-Energy Technology · 4 files in common
- Glass for Europe · 4 files in common
Showing 5 of 146.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Fastighetsägarna’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.