Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

MOT
MOTUS-E

Industry association · Italy

4
files engaged
of 583 tracked
6
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
TE
49
files engaged
of 583 tracked
59
positions filed
in those 583 files
21.7
declared FTE
self-declared
26
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (3)

Batteries and waste batteries · Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure · Evaluation of the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Batteries and waste batteries

Transport & Environment · filed 1 Jul 2020 · source

Lithium-ion batteries will be the backbone of the economy’s decarbonisation, notably the EU transport. Unlike combustion engines that burn oil and release harmful emissions, batteries can be reused and recycled at the end of their lives. Batteries are the best technology we have today to make our road transport emissions-free.

MOTUS-E · filed 8 Jul 2020 · source

The new regulatory framework should address the current market needs in order to ensure an efficient batteries’ life cycle management, both from an environmental and economic point of view. From this perspective and as highlighted during the consultation activities, here is what we recommend regarding: extended producer responsibility for second-life, battery recycling, battery design and manufacturing.

MOTUS-E · filed 26 Feb 2021 · source

Motus-E welcomes the European Commission’s Regulation Proposal and fully supports the measures that aim to ensure a competitive, circular, sustainable and safe value chain for all batteries placed on the internal Union Market, overcoming the barriers to the functioning of recycling industry and the environmental problems related to the production, use and End-of-Life management of batteries.

Transport & Environment · filed 1 Mar 2021 · source

This submission is made on behalf of four European NGOs: ECOS, EEB (The European Environmental Bureau), Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH – Environmental Action Germany, and Transport & Environment, all with an interest in the development of an environmentally sustainable battery value chain in Europe.

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

Transport & Environment · filed 29 Apr 2020 · source

The EU urgently needs a new and robust legislative framework on zero emission infrastructure to support the 33-44 million electric cars (battery and plug-in hybrid) expected on the road in 2030 to align with transport decarbonisation goals. Consumers should have access to the EU single market for chargers.

MOTUS-E · filed 1 May 2020 · source

MOTUS-E welcomes the initiative of the Commission to evaluate the Directive 2014/94/EU. We believe the current provisions fail to support the goals of establishing a common framework of measures to mitigate the environmental impact of transport, since many of the alternative fuels allowed in the present release emit CO2 and some of them are pure or derivate fossil fuels.

MOTUS-E · filed 16 Nov 2021 · source

Motus-e strongly welcomes the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation and fully supports the measures that aim to deploy alternative fuels infrastructure as a necessary instrument to reduce emissions from the transport sector in the long term in the European Union.

Transport & Environment · filed 18 Nov 2021 · source

Transport & Environment (T&E) welcomes the Commission’s (EC) proposal for a regulation on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure. In particular the change of the legislative instrument from directive to a regulation T&E considers an important step in the right direction. (detailed feedback in attachment).

Evaluation of the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Directive

Transport & Environment · filed 15 Mar 2019 · source

Emobility is at the core of decarbonising Europe’s transport, since all new cars and vans and most new trucks sold in early-2030s will have to be zero emission if Europe is to comply with the Paris Agreement. This requires a speedy and comprehensive roll-out of charging infrastructure across Europe, but the current Directive 2014/94/EU is not aligned with EU’s climate goals or in line with the expected roll-out of…

MOTUS-E · filed 19 Mar 2019 · source

Due to the rapid development of the EV market, and the necessity of a legislation that encourages further expansion, MOTUS-E considers that the current AFI Directive does no longer set the adequate framework to accompany the expected growing uptake of EV in the coming years.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.