A key point that Motus-E would like to convey concerns the classification of ZEVs. In this respect, we note that the Commissions proposal for the revision of the CO Regulation introduces a pragmatic approach whereby zero-emission vehicles of category N may be counted as light commercial vehicles when the reference mass minus the mass of the energy storage system remains below 2840 kg.
MOT
MOTUS-E
Industry association · Italy
6
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 583 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track MOTUS-E in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at MOTUS-E? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
MOTUS-E filed 6 positions between 19 Mar 2019 and 23 Jan 2026, across 4 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
2019 · 1 filed2020 · 2 filed2021 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Motus-E welcomes the European Commission’s Regulation Proposal and fully supports the measures that aim to ensure a competitive, circular, sustainable and safe value chain for all batteries placed on the internal Union Market, overcoming the barriers to the functioning of recycling industry and the environmental problems related to the production, use and End-of-Life management of batteries.
The new regulatory framework should address the current market needs in order to ensure an efficient batteries’ life cycle management, both from an environmental and economic point of view. From this perspective and as highlighted during the consultation activities, here is what we recommend regarding: extended producer responsibility for second-life, battery recycling, battery design and manufacturing.
Motus-e strongly welcomes the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation and fully supports the measures that aim to deploy alternative fuels infrastructure as a necessary instrument to reduce emissions from the transport sector in the long term in the European Union.
MOTUS-E welcomes the initiative of the Commission to evaluate the Directive 2014/94/EU. We believe the current provisions fail to support the goals of establishing a common framework of measures to mitigate the environmental impact of transport, since many of the alternative fuels allowed in the present release emit CO2 and some of them are pure or derivate fossil fuels.
Due to the rapid development of the EV market, and the necessity of a legislation that encourages further expansion, MOTUS-E considers that the current AFI Directive does no longer set the adequate framework to accompany the expected growing uptake of EV in the coming years.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put MOTUS-E next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 57.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from MOTUS-E’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.