Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
34
files engaged
of 583 tracked
36
positions filed
in those 583 files
28.5
declared FTE
self-declared
16
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2008

Files both filed on (2)

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention · Union environment action programme (2021-2030)

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention

Familienbetriebe Land und Forst/ German Landowners Organization · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

We support the general principles of the Aarhus Convention (AC). However, we are critical that the current proposal contains redefinitions and reinterpretations that go well beyond the original scope of the Aarhus Convention. Actions of general scope will in future also be covered by the AC (“acts of general scope”).

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

WWF European Policy Office · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

Delivery of the European Green Deal depends on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law by EU institutions. To ensure compliance, the EU needs strong mechanisms that allow civil society to hold EU institutions to account when they fail to deliver on their commitments. Presently, there are no effective means for the public to seek judicial review of EU acts that breach environmental law.

Union environment action programme (2021-2030)

Familienbetriebe Land und Forst/ German Landowners Organization · filed 15 Dec 2020 · source

Family farms and forests welcome the fact that the European Commission is pursuing ambitious plans for climate protection and biodiversity through the EU Green Deal and related environmental programmes. But both can only be achieved together with agriculture and forestry and the commitment of owners and managers. We are happy to present our vision with a 12-point Green Deal Plan (see uploaded document).

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

WWF European Policy Office · filed 21 Dec 2020 · source

WWF European Policy Office believes that as it stands the 8th EAP proposal lacks the overall ambition and forward-looking actions to tackle environmental degradation and achieve the EU’s long-term aim of ‘living well, within the means of our planet’. The document attached provides recommendations for strengthening the proposal and reaching this long-term aim.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.