Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

4
files engaged
of 583 tracked
5
positions filed
in those 583 files
0.8
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2020

34
files engaged
of 583 tracked
36
positions filed
in those 583 files
28.5
declared FTE
self-declared
16
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2008

Files both filed on (2)

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention · Mid-term evaluation of the LIFE programme 2021-2027

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Environment: access to information and justice, public participation, application of the Arhus Convention

Associazione Italiana Elettrosensibili · filed 22 Oct 2020 · source

One initiative that leads to the practical possibility of access to justice at EU level for everything that is inherent in the legality of decisions taken with an impact on the environment is... A MUST! Apart from the two specific requests for amendment of the Aarhus Convention set out in your document, which are very technical requests, we would point out here that the AARHUS Convention is completely unknown to…

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

WWF European Policy Office · filed 10 Dec 2020 · source

Delivery of the European Green Deal depends on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law by EU institutions. To ensure compliance, the EU needs strong mechanisms that allow civil society to hold EU institutions to account when they fail to deliver on their commitments. Presently, there are no effective means for the public to seek judicial review of EU acts that breach environmental law.

Mid-term evaluation of the LIFE programme 2021-2027

Associazione Italiana Elettrosensibili · filed 5 Aug 2023 · source

Include "Waste from Electrical and Electronical Equipment" (WEEE), other waste products, and the environmental impacts of mining for rare earth minerals and metals used in electronical equipment in the Zero pollution action plan Explanation In addition to the current 5G technology rollout with huge amounts of cables and antennas the introduction of billions of 5G-connected wireless devices (clothes, nappies…

Associazione Italiana Elettrosensibili · filed 5 Aug 2023 · source

Reduce the massive electricity consumption caused by digital communication technology, e.g. by prioritizing wired solutions and low energy solutions in the action plan for the European Green Deal According to Directive 2012/27/EU on energy efficiency, the Union places energy efficiency and the need for decoupling energy use from economic growth at the core of the Union energy strategy.

WWF European Policy Office · filed 15 Sept 2023 · source

General objective: We strongly recommend to reinforce the use of the Nature-based Solutions (NbS) across the LIFE programme to guarantee high-quality interventions both for nature and people. While the specific priorities of the LIFE Nature and Biodiversity sub-programme includes NbS and ecosystem approaches, this approach is missing in the general objective and the specific objectives of the other sub-programmes.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.