Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Energy labelling requirements for electronic displays

14 submissions from 14 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 47 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 14 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

6 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 8 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 6Civil society 8Public authorities, academia, other 0

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 5 Feb 2025 — it ran from 13 Nov 2024.

Policy area
Energy (DG ENER)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Sept 2026 · in 31 days

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment21 Sept 2023
  2. Public consultation5 Feb 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Reg del draft, Reg del.

14 positions

C

CLASP

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

CLASP welcomes the European Commissions initiative to review the ecodesign and energy labelling regulation for electronic displays, and we are thankful for the opportunity to offer feedback. We agree that the main aspects listed in the consultation document all deserve attention.

LinkedInX
C

Cefic

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

Cefic supports the Commission Services in removing any reference to chemicals in Ecodesign requirements for electronic displays, as they are better addressed under the proposed Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).

LinkedInX
E

ECOS

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

ECOS, Deutsche Umwelthilfe, IFixIt, and the Coolproducts campaign welcome the publication of the call for evidence for an impact assessment on the review of the eco-design and energy labelling requirements for electronic displays.

LinkedInX
EH

European Heating Industry

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The European Heating Industry (EHI) would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to provide feedback for the Consultation on the Eco-design and Energy labelling Requirements for Electronic Displays. At EHI we work on various Ecodesign and Energy labelling regulations that include our hydronic space and water heaters and their components in the scope.

LinkedInX
D

DIGITALEUROPE

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

DIGITALEUROPE welcomes the opportunity to respond to the European Commission's Call for evidence and lend support to the reviewing of Ecodesign Regulation 2019/2021 and Energy labelling Regulation 2019/2013. This position paper elaborates on our perspectives and recommendations concerning the proposed review and potential revision of these regulations.

LinkedInX
DU

Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V.

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

DUH welcomes the initiative to review ecodesign and energy labelling requirements for electronic displays as this has the potential to decrease electronic waste and to set a new European standard when it comes to sustainability of devices. Up to 80 % of the environmental impact of those products is determined at the design phase.

LinkedInX
A

ANEC

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

ANEC welcomes the opportunity to provide comment on the current Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Regulations for Electronic Displays in order to help improve revised Regulations for this important product group. Our position is summarised in the attached position paper, we invite al relevant stakeholders to read it.

LinkedInX
BT

BEUC - The European Consumer Organisation

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

BEUC welcomes this initiative by the European Commission to revise the current Ecodesign and energy labelling regulations, with the view of further improving their energy efficiency and boosting the circular economy. We support the objective of systematically tackling material efficiency issues such as durability, reparability and recyclability, making sure products last longer and are easier to repair.

LinkedInX
TB

The Beryllium Science and Technology Association (BeST)

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

The Beryllium Science and Technology Association (BeST) represents the manufacturers, suppliers and users of beryllium metal, beryllium containing alloys and beryllium oxide ceramics in the EU market. BeST has the objective of promoting sound policies, regulations, science and actions related to the safe use of beryllium and to serve as an expert resource for the international community on the benefits and…

LinkedInX
TI

The International Bromine Council

· · filed 21 Sept 2023 · source

PDF

BSEF appreciates the opportunity to respond to the call of evidence of the eco-design and energy labelling requirements for electronic displays. Please see the full paper attached. BSEF maintains that the ban on halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays is unwarranted and not consistent with EU Directives and Regulations concerning restriction of chemicals in materials and…

LinkedInX
EA

Elektrosmog a zdravie

· · filed 6 Sept 2023 · source

The Citizens’ Association Elektrosmog and Health welcomes this initiative as this initiative would help deliver on the European Green Deal with the main objective of reducing consumer energy bills and improving the EU’s security of supply by reducing primary energy consumption and reducing energy imports. However, one aspect has not been identified in the proposed Directive: wireless communications.

Filed in Slovak · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AI

Associazione Italiana Elettrosensibili

· · filed 6 Sept 2023 · source

The Italian ElectroSensitive Association (IEA) supports this initiative, which must help achieve the European Green Deal with the main objective of reducing consumers’ energy bills and improving the EU’s security of supply by reducing primary energy consumption and reducing energy imports. Current ecodesign and energy labelling legislation has reduced the energy consumption of electronic displays.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
W

WEL

· · filed 4 Sept 2023 · source

As long as the issue of Europe’s energy sovereignty is not addressed, these measures do not seem to me to be very useful (is a heat pump green if electricity is produced by coal?). In addition, this score should take into account the total energy cost of the product and not only during its use phase, i.e.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EF

Europeans for Safe Connections

· · filed 31 Aug 2023 · source

We "Europeans for Safe Connections" endorses that this initiative would help deliver on the European Green Deal with main goal to reduce consumer energy bills and improve the EUs security of supply by reducing primary energy consumption and decreasing energy imports The current regulations ecodesign and energy labelling have reduced the energy consumption of electronic displays.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 14 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.