The forest cover in Croatia is in increase for decades but that does not reflects the state of the forests in Croatia. The current definition of forest is misleading, as it can include land that is or has recently been used for agriculture, as well as non-native plantations and even tree-less areas (i.e., clearcuts where forest regeneration is planned).
Association Biom
Environmental organization · Croatia · EU Transparency Register 249833726202-19
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #298 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- BirdLife International (BLI), https://www.birdlife.org/
- International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), https://www.iucn.org/
- Zeleni forum (Green Forum), https://zeleni-forum.org/
- Croatian Platform for International Citizen Solidarity (CROSOL), https://crosol.hr/hr/
- Nacionalna ruralna mreža (National Rural Network), https://nrm.hr/
- Mediterranean Alliance for wetlands (MAW), https://www.medallianceforwetlands.org/
- Renewable Grid Initiative (RGI), https://renewables-grid.eu/
- Mreža mladih Hrvatske, https://www.mmh.hr/
- Together for the Med, https://www.togetherforthemed.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Biom Association (Biom)
- Head office
- Zagreb, Croatia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Association in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Association Biom? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Association Biom filed 2 positions between 7 Feb 2024 and 1 Aug 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
The CAP must remain a tool for sustainable farming not a threat to nature At a time when the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) should play a key role in aligning European agriculture with environmental and climate challenges, the proposed changes under the so-called Omnibus Regulation move in the opposite direction.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- BirdLife Europe and Central Asia · 2 files in common
- NABU · 2 files in common
- Ministerstvo zemědělství · 2 files in common
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Association Biom’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.