Industry association · Spain · EU Transparency Register 814014013312-48
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #378 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track ASPAPEL in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ASPAPEL? so we know who speaks for it.
ASPAPEL filed 4 positions between 2 Feb 2022 and 8 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
In response to the public consultation process on the proposed reference values for the period 2026-2030, ASPAPEL proposes: Maintain the current reference values freeze the reference values for the period 2021-2025 and apply them unchanged for the period 2026-2030 to avoid reductions based on outdated assumptions and preserve investment predictability.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Two of the crucial aspects of the European Union’s structure are: — the unity of the market — the emission reduction targets set out in the Green Deal It therefore seems inconsistent for the current Community legislation to provide for limits on the maximum authorised weights of certain different vehicles in the different Member States of the European Union.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Question 11: Do you consider additional measures necessary to reduce grid connection lead times? Should there be differentiated approaches for different types of uses (industry decarbonisation, residential heat, charging infrastructure)? Yes, additional measures are needed to reduce grid connection lead times.
We welcome the Commission's approach to simplify EU legislation with the objective of reducing administrative burdens, particularly for SMEs. However, with the proposed Omnibus IV on aligning product legislation in the digital age, ASPAPEL is concerned about setting a 'digital only' approach in product legislation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 34.
Everything on this page comes from ASPAPEL’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.