Leaseurope, Eurofinas, True Sale International GmbH (TSI) and the German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC), expressly welcome the European Commission's initiative to revise the securitisation framework as a whole.
EU consultation
Amendments to the treatment of securitisation exposures under the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Delegated Regulation
24 submissions from 24 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 28 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 24 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
18 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
What the room declares
- 17 of 24
- in the EU Register
- 96
- full-time lobbying staff
- €17.4M+
- declared costs a year
- 54
- EP accreditations declared
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 15 Jul 2025 — it ran from 17 Jun 2025.
- Policy area
- Financial services (DG FISMA)
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Adoption expected
- 31 Dec 2026 · in 123 days
How it got here
- Reg del draft15 Jul 2025
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Reg del.
24 positions
BNP PARIBAS GROUP
· · filed 15 Jul 2025 · source
We welcome the Commissions June 17th holistic initiative for revitalizing the EU securitisation market and its clear willingness to act on several fronts to achieve the intended result; in particular, the determination to amend the LCR Delegated Regulation as regards the eligibility of securitisations in the liquidity buffer of banks is an essential move in the right direction.
The ASF (Association française des Sociétés Financières) brings together all specialized credit institutions: some 250 members with outstandings of 306 billion, or almost 18% of total French private-sector loans to the economy.
The German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC), True Sale International GmbH (TSI), Eurofinas and Leaseurope expressly welcome the European Commission's initiative to revise the securitisation framework as a whole.
The German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC), True Sale International GmbH (TSI), Eurofinas and Leaseurope expressly welcome the European Commission's initiative to revise the securitisation framework as a whole.
The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commissions call for feedback on targeted amendments to the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Delegated Regulation. Please find our feedback in the uploaded file.
We generally view favourably the EC proposals for amending the eligibility conditions for securitisations in the liquidity buffer of credit institutions. Combined with the proposals regarding CRR and the Securitisation Regulation, they make it more attractive for banks to diversify the LCR portfolios towards securitisations in the Level 2B bucket.
Crédit Agricole Group strongly welcomes the review of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) Delegated Regulation and the European Commissions (EC) intention to find a better balance between stability and market development. Securitisation enhances credit circulation and reduces risk concentration by distributing it across diverse market participants.
CECA (Spanish Association of Savings and Retail Banks) welcomes the opportunity to comment on European Commission consultation on the draft Commission Delegated Regulation amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 as regards the eligibility conditions for securitisations in the liquidity buffer of credit institutions.
Chamber of Labour
· · filed 15 Jul 2025 · source
While we agree that the double transformation creates a huge investment gap and that a higher investment ratio would be desirable in the current cyclical situation, we see the problem more in high uncertainty and subdued sales expectations. This is also shown by the ECB’s surveys on the access to finance (safe) regularly and most recently.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
We very much appreciate the European Commissions consultation paper to review the treatment of securitisations under the liquidity coverage ratio in order to foster the role of bank treasuries as investors of this instrument. The strengthening of the demand side of securitisations will lead to a more competitive securitisation market and, ultimately, to benefits to lending to the EU economy.
We welcome the Commissions proposed amendment to the LCR Delegated Act increasing the eligibility of senior tranches of STS traditional securitisations with credit quality CQS5 to CQS7as a first step in shifting away from the current treatment, which results overly conservative and deeply affects the market liquidity of those securities, in turn impacting their price and issuance volume, ultimately discouraging…
National Bank of Belgium
· · filed 14 Jul 2025 · source
Dear Mr/ Ms. We thank you for the opportunity to commont on the amendments to the treatment of securitisations under the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Delegated Regulation. We strongly oppose the changes proposed to the Delegated Regulation for the liquidity coverage ratio.
On behalf of the Luxembourg Bankers Association (ABBL), we are pleased to submit our response to the European Commissions open Have Your Say process on the proposed review of the Securitisation Regulation (SECR) framework. The ABBL welcomes the Commissions initiative to review and enhance the SECR.
ESBG welcomes the European Commissions initiative to strengthen the securitisation market as a means to support the EUs broader strategic objectives. To motivate banks and other financial entities to invest in high-quality, low-risk EU asset-backed securities (ABS) is a key step toward normalizing demand in the securitisation market. This can help boost lending to the EUs real economy at more competitive rates.
De Nederlandsche Bank (the Netherlands)
· · filed 14 Jul 2025 · source
Thank you for sharing the Amendments to the treatment of securitisation exposures under the LCR Delegated Regulation. We hereby share with you the feedback on behalf of De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB). We share the view of the Commission that it is important to facilitate funding of EU strategic objectives.
Dutch Securitisation Association
· · filed 14 Jul 2025 · source
European Commission Consultation, as part of the Securitisation Package of 17 June, on amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 as regards the eligibility conditions for securitisations in the liquidity buffer of credit institutions This document provides the response of the Dutch Securitisation Association (DSA) on the Consultation. We welcome the opportunity to respond on this Consultation.
Italian Banking Association - ABI
· · filed 14 Jul 2025 · source
Securitisation can allow banks to strengthen and increase their capability to provide more lending to the real economy, enabling them to free up regulatory capital which can be used to originate new loans, and it can contribute to a well-diversifying funding source.
AFG - french asset management association
· · filed 11 Jul 2025 · source
We welcome the securitisation reform presented by the European Commission. AFG is especially supportive of the additional flexibility on the investor / regulatory reporting, and supportive of the reduced redundancy for due diligence. We would however warn on the proposed widened definition of public securitisation, which will have adverse effects.
Paris Europlace welcomes the reopening of the LCR Delegated Act, and fully concurs with the Commissions assessments that The eligibility of securitisations in the liquidity buffer is considered to be an important criterion for all market participants to invest in securitisations, as it enables them to find active counterparties on capital markets, including credit institutions, to trade their portfolios, and that…
Finance Denmark
· · filed 10 Jul 2025 · source
Finance Denmark appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback regarding the amendments to the prudential treatment of securitisation exposures under the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Delegated Regulation. We support the Commissions initiative to revise the eligibility conditions for securitisations in the liquidity buffer of credit institutions.
While we support reducing issuer reporting burdens, redefining public securitisation based on EU listings risks unintended consequences. It may drive issuers to non-EU venues and misclassify private deals, undermining the SIUs goals. Clearer, risk-aligned criteria are essential to preserve market efficiency and the attractiveness as well as the integrity of EU financial infrastructures.
Treatment of STS securitisations and ABCPs for the LCR European Supervision Authorities have published on March 31, 2025, their Joint Committee Report on the implementation and functioning of the Securitisation Regulation that feeds into the upcoming European Commission legislative revision of the securitisation regulatory framework.
Our feedback aims to support the European Commission in aligning the Liquidity Coverage Ratio Delegated Regulation with the EUs broader goals of digitalisation, sustainability, and competitiveness. Building on recent policy milestones, our recommendations focus on enhancing financial resilience through the integration of digital tools, interoperable standards, and ESG-linked incentives.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.