Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Stepping up EU Action against Deforestation and Forest Degradation

60 submissions from 58 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 1,156 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 60 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

16 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 34 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 16Civil society 34Public authorities, academia, other 10

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

16 of 58
in the EU Register
105
full-time lobbying staff
€1.8M+
declared costs a year
84
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 25 Feb 2019 — it ran from 14 Jan 2019.

Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption

How it got here

  1. Roadmap15 Jan 2019
  2. Public consultation25 Feb 2019

Showing 25 of 60 submissions.

ME

Mighty Earth

· · filed 16 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

Introduction We thank you for the opportunity to offer input on the Roadmap towards a Communication on Stepping Up EU Action against Deforestation and Forest Degradation. Mighty Earth welcomes an integrated European Union approach to combat the deforestation, forest degradation, peatland destruction, forest burning, exploitation of people, and egregious human rights abuses that currently characterize many EU supply…

LinkedInX
G

Greenpeace

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

Hello, I believe it is important and urgent for the European Commission to take a firm stance against the deforestation of primary forests by multinationals and to propose penalties for the damage done. This is important for at least 3 reasons: > safeguarding biodiversity > global warming > protection of scented populations Best regards

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
NA

Nature and Youth Sweden

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

We, Nature and Youth Sweden, welcome this initiative. Our organization has over seventy years of experience in environmental issues associated with deforestation and forest degradation. We see that, time after time, companies’ desire to make profit triumphs over environmental rights with the consequences being loss of biodiversity and increasing numbers of endangered species.

LinkedInX
TR

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

Protecting forests, and other carbon- and biodiversity- rich land presents a huge opportunity to deliver climate change mitigation and reduce biodiversity loss, which in turn delivers a host of critical ecosystem services that range from local benefits: pollination, local climate regulation (temperature, wind, humidity), healthy soils, to regional and global benefits, including reduced and avoided emissions…

LinkedInX

Good morning Dear Tout.te.s, I share with you the contribution of the Civil Society Organisations Network for the Development of Tonkpi (ROSCDET) www.roscidet.com. It is a network of Ivorian NGOs specialising in research and development of environmental solutions, the green economy, finance for the fight against change. climate, sustainable development. The 2063 EU Agenda African.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RA

Rainforest Alliance

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

The Rainforest Alliance welcomes the European Union (EU) communication on stepping up EU Action against Deforestation and Forest Degradation as increased commitment to action in the fight against deforestation and forest degradation. We believe that EU support will bring essential added value, especially in installing demand-side measures and providing supply-side support.

LinkedInX
UO

University of Padova/ TESAF Department

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

As a University department with more than 20 years of experience in different aspects of forest management and conservation we are happy to finally see attempts to assume responsibilities and to reduce negative impacts on important ecosystems and forest lands located outside of EU.

LinkedInX
FS

Forest Stewardship Council A.C.

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

I respond on behalf of FSC, the Forest Stewardship Council. FSC welcomes the decision of the Commission to develop an action plan focussing on both forest degradation and deforestation, which together, in particular in the tropics, are important sources of biodiversity loss and climate change.

LinkedInX
CF

CAOBISCO for ESPOAG

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

ESPOAG Feedback to the European Commission Roadmap “Deforestation and forest degradation – stepping up EU action” The European Sustainable Palm Oil Advocacy Group (ESPOAG) representing EU food sectors is committed to supporting the EU to stop deforestation and to support the promotion of this objective at the international level.

LinkedInX
IN

INKOTA-netzwerk

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

INKOTA (www.inkota.de) is a development organization in Germany. We are working on human rights in global value chains and on global agriculture and food security. The following feedback is specifically with regards to developments in the cocoa sector. INKOTA welcomes the initiative of the European Commission to set up a roadmap on deforestation and forest degradation.

LinkedInX
EC

European Cocoa Association (ECA)

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

ECA members have been closely following developments at EU level to consider policy options in line with the EU forest strategy to end deforestation and forest degradation. Therefore, ECA members welcome the EU suggested coherent and comprehensive approach and notably the proposed support to existing commitments by governments and the private sector.

LinkedInX
SN

Solidaridad Network

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

Solidaridad Network welcomes the publication of the roadmap for a Communication on stepping up EU Action against Deforestation and Forest Degradation. We value the aim to increase the coherence of existing EU policies and voluntary principles, and help better implement actions that are already undertaken by governments and by the private sector to reduce global deforestation.

LinkedInX
WF

World Fair Trade Organization - Europe

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

The World Fair Trade Organization Europe welcomes the European Commission’s initiative on mitigating deforestation and forest degradation and current models of production and trade of Forest Risk Agricultural Commodities (FRAC) many of which are unsustainable and already identified as main causes of deforestation.

LinkedInX
ET

EPOA -The European Palm Oil Alliance

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

EPOA (The European Palm Oil Alliance) acknowledges the importance of this publication aiming to tackle the problem of deforestation and forest degradation including international action at public and private level. EPOA believes that the protection of rainforest is only possible when we cooperate with each other and empower those companies that make sustainable palm oil a reality.

LinkedInX
B

BASP

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

BASP – Belgian Alliance for Sustainable Palm Oil – started its activities in 2012 and now has 16 members, including companies and industry associations. Their common goal is to increase awareness about sustainable palm oil, by setting the example and monitoring the progress made in their respective sectors.

LinkedInX
NR

Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

NRDC welcomes the EU’s initiative to tackle global deforestation and forest degradation. The world must take urgent action to halt the devastation of the world’s forest, which are vital for biodiversity, and are our best tool for removing heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The roadmap correctly identifies the expansion of agriculture as one key driver of global deforestation and forest degradation.

LinkedInX
WR

World Resources Institute

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

The World Resources Institute welcomes the introduction of a roadmap to step-up EU action against deforestation. The roadmap should not be limited to current regulations and include consideration of new regulations on trade in products linked to deforestation. This could be modelled broadly on the EU timber regulation and related EU FLEGT Action Plan.

LinkedInX
VF

Volt France

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

Volt France opinion We welcome the European Commission’s proposal to address problems related to deforestation and forest degradation. We also support the proposed measures, which in our view are aimed at creating more transparency and cooperation between stakeholders in the forest industry sector.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
OW

Oxfam-Wereldwinkels

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

Various studies have shown the particular responsibility the EU has when it comes to countering this deforestation crisis. In the cocoa sector, for example, more than 60% of global cocoa goes through the EU. Therefore, the EU really holds a key position to push for change in this sector.

LinkedInX
GF

Global Forest Coalition and Biofuelwatch

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

A coherent EU forest Action Plan is long overdue. It must include binding legislative measures and ensure that other EU Directives and decisions do not undermine the aims of halting deforestation and biodiversity loss by 2020, as set out in the Sustainable Development Goals and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Aichi Targets.

LinkedInX
GW

Global Witness

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

Global Witness welcomes the road map and plans to publish a communication on stepping up EU Action Against Deforestation and Forest Degradation. However, we are concerned that the road map indicates that the long-awaited communication may not include the measures needed to make a difference as it appears to rule out new legislation and is limited to setting out a “framework for existing policies and tools”.

LinkedInX
FT

Forest Trends

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

Forest Trends welcomes the Roadmap as an acknowledgement that the Commission desires to amplify its action to address deforestation and forest degradation. However, we are concerned that the framework relies solely on increasing the coherence of existing EU policies and tools, existing commitments by governments and the private sector, and actions already undertaken by the EU and Member States.

LinkedInX
E

ETRMA

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

PDF

The European Tyre & Rubber Manufacturers Association (ETRMA) and its members are fully committed to ensure sustainable production and supply of natural rubber. This means looking after the people, communities and natural resources touched by natural rubber production and supply. Therefore, ETRMA supports the Commission’s Deforestation Roadmap initiative.

LinkedInX
BJ

Bayerischer Jagdverband

· · filed 15 Jan 2019 · source

The Bavarian Hunting Association as a recognised nature conservation association regularly assesses the development of Bavarian forests. For a long time, the area of forests in Bavaria has not decreased but, on the contrary, is on the rise. The Bavarian forestry administration also agrees with this statement.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 60 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.