NGO · Spain · EU Transparency Register 9832909575-41
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 784 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #166 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Greenpeace in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Greenpeace European Unit? so we know who speaks for it.
Greenpeace European Unit filed 4 positions between 17 May 2024 and 18 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
ECODES (Ecology and Development Foundation) welcomes the Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA) as a tool to create lead markets for low-carbon products. However, we warn that the proposal has lost focus on decarbonisation and risks consolidating the status quo rather than boosting real investment. We focused our observations on steel and cement/concrete. Objective (Art. 2).
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The Arctic is warming three to four times faster than the global average, making it one of the most environmentally vulnerable and geopolitically sensitive regions in the world. Rapid climate change is transforming ecosystems, accelerating ice melt and increasing global attention to the regions natural resources and strategic importance.
Greenpeace opposes the proposed increase of the limits of the overall nitrogen load allowed in environmentally vulnerable zones as currently regulated by the Nitrates directive (91/676/EEC). The EU already experiences a significant and harmful overload of nitrogen in its waters and ecosystems across rural areas, which causes worrying levels of pollution.
The EUs LULUCF sector is critical for the EUs 2030 and 2050 climate targets, as well as for the protection of biodiversity but the EU is about to miss its targets both for carbon removals as well as for halting biodiversity loss in the land sector. The carbon sink of the LULUCF sector has been in decline since 2010 and according to the EEA the last 10-year trend has consistently pointed in the wrong direction.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 30.
Everything on this page comes from Greenpeace European Unit’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.