Uppsala University supports and endorses the comments submitted by The Guild. In addition, Uppsala University would like to highlight the following points: 1. Accessibility and legal compliance of educational activities: All educational activities offered by KICs should be structured in a manner that allows legal participation by all relevant stakeholders.
UU
Uppsala University
Academic / research · Sweden
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Uppsala in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Uppsala University? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Uppsala University filed 4 positions between 5 Sept 2023 and 18 Sept 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2023 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
Evidence on Excellence Initiatives and Gender Inequality in Research Funding Research from Sweden provides strong evidence that large-scale excellence funding schemes, introduced in the 2000s to concentrate resources in strategic or world-leading research environments, have had severe negative effects on gender equality: Disproportionate allocation of excellence funding to men: Women constitute around 30% of the top…
As a co-lead for the OCP Heat Reuse Policies workstream, I deal with numerous data centre sustainability-related policies globally. I therefore welcome the effort of simplification and harmonisation across EU policies. A harmonised and clearly labeled rating scheme would absolutely help. That being said, the question is what the rating will be used _for_.
I'm an independent academic, having for several decades researched many aspects of mercury, ranging from environmental and health affetcs of mercury used in goldmining to dental amalgam, including the link between dental amalgam and illegal gold mining using mercury. The mercury is often imported legally into Latin American countries for use in goldmining by stating that the mercury will be used for dental use.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Uppsala University next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 11.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Uppsala University’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.