Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

European Health Data Space HealthData@EU requirements

55 submissions from 54 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 65 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 55 from organizations. Not shown: 10 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. About this data →

Who showed up

22 submissions from industry (companies and their trade associations) against 11 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 22Civil society 11Public authorities, academia, other 22

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations: a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

19 of 54
in the EU Register
53
full-time lobbying staff
€7.5M+
declared costs a year
41
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 20 Oct 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 29 Sept 2026; it ran from 1 Sept 2026.

Policy area
Health & food (DG SANTE)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2026

How it got here

  1. Draft implementing regulation29 Sept 2026

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Dec impl.

Showing 25 of 55 submissions.

SH

Siemens Healthineers AG

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Siemens Healthineers welcomes the opportunity to comment on the technical requirements under the European Health Data Space Regulation and supports the objective of a harmonized, interoperable framework for the primary and secondary use of electronic health data across the Union. Our detailed comments are set out in the attached position paper.

LinkedInX
NH

NFDI4Health (funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG))

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

We welcome the draft in principle, in particular the clear functional separation between the central platforms technical routing functions and substantive access decisions by the competent bodies, as well as the proportionate, graduated system of corrective measures, temporary disconnection and, where applicable, definitive exclusion. However, we recommend clarification and revision in several areas: 1.

LinkedInX
LH

Lean Health Studio - PHDS.pl

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PHDS.pl (Polish Health Data Space) is an independent EHDS knowledge platform in Poland. We support the federated architecture, which allows Member States to build on existing national infrastructures, and the broad understanding of interoperability in Article 5(3).

LinkedInX
DM

Dr. Max

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Dr.Max feedback on the draft Commission Implementing Regulation on HealthData@EU Ares(2026)8339104 Dr.Max operates retail pharmacies in multiple EU Member States and supports the objectives of the European Health Data Space and HealthData@EU.

LinkedInX
G

GSK

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

GSK supports a risk-based and proportionate implementation of HealthData@EU that enables trusted secondary use of health data for research, innovation and public health purposes while maintaining high standards of privacy, security and accountability.

LinkedInX
MT

MyData-Trust

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

MyData-TRUST, a Belgian consultancy providing data protection services to the life sciences sector, welcomes the draft Implementing Regulation on HealthData@EU as a sound basis for secure, interoperable cross-border secondary use of health data. The separation between the platform's purely technical role and the substantive decisions of health data access bodies (Art. 4(2)) should be preserved.

LinkedInX
EC

European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (EUCOPE)

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

The European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (EUCOPE) welcomes the draft Commission Implementing Regulation setting out the technical requirements, interoperability, and operational framework for HealthData@EU under Regulation (EU) 2025/327.

LinkedInX
EE

(EFMI )European Federation for Medcial Informatics

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Feedback from the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) on the draft Commission Implementing Regulation on HealthData@EU (Ares(2026)8339104) EFMI, founded in 1976, is the federation of national health and medical informatics societies of more than 30 European countries and of institutional members (hospitals, research institutes and universities), and the European regional council of IMIA.

LinkedInX
S

Sanofi

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Sanofi welcomes the EHDS and its potential to drive health innovation in Europe while urging implementation clarity, protections, and lead times needed for genuine research value. The following is our feedback on the draft HealthData@EU implementing regulation: Connected Entities (Articles 2(b) & 5) Publish implementation timelines well in advance given varying digital maturity of entities.

LinkedInX
HR

Health-RI

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

On behalf of Health-RI, we welcome the opportunity to contribute to the public consultation on the draft implementing act concerning HealthData@EU under Article 75 of the European Health Data Space (EHDS) Regulation.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
ES

European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), representing over 50,000 members globally, welcomes the publication of the draft Implementing Act setting out the technical and functional framework for the HealthData@EU infrastructure under the European Health Data Space (EHDS) as well as the specifications of the IT tool for enforcement transparency.

LinkedInX
MS

Malta Sociological Association

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

The Malta Sociological Association (MSA) notes the development of technical requirements for HealthData@EU and recognises the potential value of secure health data for research, evidence-informed policymaking and improved health systems. Given the sensitivity of health data, implementation should place public trust, privacy, transparency and accountability at its centre.

LinkedInX
E

Epic

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Timeline to Release Technical Documentation Article 5.4 states that specifications will be released "sufficiently in advance of the start of those checks to enable the entities concerned to prepare their system and connection." Given the overall deadline to start exchanging data in early 2029, providing specifications much later than the finalised implementing acts will already put some vendors and Member States at…

LinkedInX
ME

MedTech Europe

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

MedTech Europe welcomes the opportunity to respond to the public consultation on the draft Commission Implementing Act on HealthData@EU, adopted pursuant to the European Health Data Space (EHDS) Regulation. We support the Commissions objective of establishing a secure, interoperable and trustworthy cross-border infrastructure for the secondary use of electronic health data.

LinkedInX
N

Nictiz

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

The attachment contains Nictizs consolidated comments on the draft implementing act concerning HealthData@EU under Article 75 of the European Health Data Space Regulation. The comments focus on clear governance, reliable operation of the central platform, proportionate compliance checks, incident and disconnection procedures, and the allocation of responsibilities.

LinkedInX
C

ChipSoft

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Ballot on the Draft HealthData@EU Implementing Regulation by ChipSoft (Netherlands) Balloters: Olav Trauschke, Roel Barelds Overall Assessment The draft generally falls within the mandate provided by Articles 63(7) and 75(12) of the EHDS Regulation and is broadly consistent with related EU legislation, including the GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, NIS2, and the Interoperable Europe Act.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
BD
PDF

The professional association of German pathologists (BDP) represents the professional policy interests of pathologists, including neurologists, in surgeries, institutes, hospitals and university hospitals. In addition to purely textual findings, pathologists generate other comprehensive data. This includes, in particular, large-scale images (whole-slide images) and molecular pathological data.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
F

Findata

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Findata supports the establishment of HealthData@EU as a centrally coordinated infrastructure combining the Commission-operated central platform with systems and components operated by connected entities. The Compliance Check Framework will be essential for translating the Regulation and the applicable technical documentation into transparent assessment criteria, evidence requirements and testing methods.

LinkedInX
SI

SNOMED International

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

SNOMED International welcomes the draft European Commission Implementing Regulation on HealthData@EU and the explicit recognition of semantic interoperability as a design principle for the cross-border secondary-use infrastructure.

LinkedInX
B

BVITG

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Bundesverband Gesundheits-IT – bvitg e. V. Bvitg Position on European Health Data Space – technical requirements for HealthData@EU Kontakt [name removed] [email removed] Bundesverband Gesundheits-IT – bvitg e. V. Aspect 1: Further clarification Art.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
EA

European Association of E-Pharmacies (EAEP)

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

The European Association of E-Pharmacies (EAEP), which represents the e-pharmacy sector on the European continent, welcomes the opportunity to provide its feedback on the technical requirements for the HealthData@EU infrastructure. The EAEP feedback is attached.

LinkedInX
F

Fresenius

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

PDF

Fresenius welcomes the proposed Implementing Regulation for HealthData@EU. It provides the technical framework for secure cross-border access to health data for secondary use and sets up a tool for cooperation between health data access bodies. If designed well, the system can support better public health decisions, stronger patient safety and more reliable regulatory evidence.

LinkedInX
CE

CRG-EGA

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

The European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) team at the Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) acknowledges the publication of the draft Commission Implementing Regulation on HealthData@EU and welcomes several areas of strong alignment between the proposed framework and the ongoing development of Federated EGA (FEGA) in Europe, as well as EGAs broader contribution to the future implementation of the European Health Data…

LinkedInX
BH

Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority

· · filed 29 Sept 2026 · source

Doing research in public health, and looking at different diseases (i.e. diabetes type 1 or 2, or different diabetes sub-categories such as LADA) or different capabilities of citizens to improve and apply their digital health literacy skills are just some of the intriguing topics, where secondary use of health data across the EU would be important to analyse.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV: all 55 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed”. You read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.