We appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commissions draft Guidance on the Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847). We support the Commissions mission to raise the cybersecurity posture of the products made available in the EU and EEA to protect citizens and Member States from threats against the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.
ES
Epic Systems
Company · United States · EU Transparency Register 414574852633-53
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #402 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since
Declares membership of
- DIGITALEUROPE https://www.digitaleurope.org/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Verona, United states
- EU office
- Bristol
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Epic in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Epic Systems? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Epic Systems filed 2 positions between 13 Apr 2026 and 12 May 2026, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Epic, a global healthcare technology company working hospitals and clinics throughout the EU and EEA, welcomes the opportunity to comment on the draft Implementing Regulation on minimum metadata elements for dataset descriptions under the EHDS. Full reasoning and recommendations are provided in the attached submission. This response summarises our principal concerns. Single authoritative source.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Epic Systems’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.