Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation · In Force

Binding standards for equality bodies

27 submissions from 22 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 227 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 27 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

0 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 13 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 0Civil society 13Public authorities, academia, other 14

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 7 Feb 2023 — it ran from 8 Dec 2022.

Policy area
Justice (DG JUST)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Commission reference
COM(2022)689

How it got here

  1. Roadmap20 Aug 2021
  2. Public consultation18 Mar 2022
  3. Prop dir3 Feb 2023
  4. Prop dir7 Feb 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 27 submissions.

EI

European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE)

· · filed 7 Feb 2023 · source

PDF

The European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) welcomes Commissions initiative and submits the attached feedback on the Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on standards for equality bodies in the field of equal treatment and equal opportunities between women and men in matters of employment and occupation, and deleting Article 20 of Directive 2006/54/EC and Article 11 of…

LinkedInX
SK

Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner

· · filed 3 Feb 2023 · source

The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SKR) is in favour of existing European anti-discrimination legislation, but does not consider that the organisation and operation of national equality bodies should be regulated at EU level. The Association considers that already existing recommendations are sufficient and that it is the practical work at local workplace level that is decisive.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GN

Gleichbehandlungsanwaltschaft /National Equality Body

· · filed 3 Feb 2023 · source

As the National Equality Body, we expressly welcome the Commission’s initiative and are largely extremely positive about the draft. We consider that we are committed to the implementation of the Equal Treatment Directives and therefore welcome in particular the provisions on equipment, the establishment of preventive work as part of the task of NEBs and the wider possibilities, e.g.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EC

Equality Commission for Northern Ireland

· · filed 3 Feb 2023 · source

PDF

The Equality Commission for Northern Ireland (ECNI) welcomes and supports the European Commissions development of binding standards to strengthen equality bodies in Europe, by setting minimum standards on how they operate in all grounds of discrimination and areas covered by EU equality legislation.

LinkedInX
E

Equinet

· · filed 3 Feb 2023 · source

Equinet welcomes the Commissions proposals, with some suggestions for improvement On multiple and intersectional discrimination, the Directives should explicitly acknowledge and name these two concepts, with a view to ensuring coherence with other legislative proposals of EU equal treatment law.

LinkedInX
E

Equinet

· · filed 3 Feb 2023 · source

Equinet welcomes the Commissions proposals, with some suggestions for improvement On the legal basis, given the complexity of two parallel Directives setting out standards for Equality Bodies, their provisions shall remain identical. Diverging or even contradicting provisions in the two Directives would lead to a confusing and ineffective system and would undermine the desired objectives.

LinkedInX
SS
PDF

The Swedish Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) applauds the two proposals to create binding standards for equality bodies, thus potentially fostering greater access to justice. However, we have a general comment and underline a major problem.

LinkedInX
SS
PDF

The Swedish Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) applauds the two proposals to create binding standards for equality bodies, thus potentially fostering greater access to justice. However, we have a general comment and underline a major problem.

LinkedInX
SS
PDF

The Swedish Section of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) applauds the two proposals to create binding standards for equality bodies, thus potentially fostering greater access to justice. However, we have a general comment and underline a major problem.

LinkedInX
EN

European Network Against Racism

· · filed 2 Feb 2023 · source

PDF

The European Commission proposal for a Council Directive setting out minimum common standards for Equality bodies represents a positive step towards the elimination of discrimination within the European Union. This instrument comes as a response to gaps and limitations in current legislative frameworks seeking to combat discrimination.

LinkedInX
TU

The Uppsala Antidiscrimination office, ADU

· · filed 2 Feb 2023 · source

The Uppsala Antidiscrimination office, ADU, is one of 18 local antidiscrimination offices in Sweden. As an NGO we offer free legal counselling to those who have been subject to discrimination. We also offer information, lectures and training in antidiscrimination and human rights, as well as lobbying and advocacy work for equal rights.

LinkedInX
TU

The Uppsala Antidiscrimination office, ADU

· · filed 2 Feb 2023 · source

The Uppsala Antidiscrimination office, ADU, is one of 18 local antidiscrimination offices in Sweden. We offer free legal counselling to those who have been subject to discrimination. We also offer information, lectures and training in antidiscrimination and human rights, as well as lobbying and advocacy work for equal rights.

LinkedInX

Malmö mot Diskriminering is an independent, non-profit organization that offers free legal advice for matters concerning the Swedish Discrimination Act. MmD welcomes the proposals intended to create binding standards for equality bodies and to improve the possibilities for individuals to get "access to justice". There is in Sweden an urgent need to give new legal impetus to such efforts.

LinkedInX
E

Eurocadres

· · filed 1 Feb 2023 · source

PDF

Eurocadres, the representative of Europes Professionals and Managers, is one of three recognised European cross-sectoral social partners, and represents over six million employees. We welcome the Commissions consultation on Equality Bodies - Binding Standards.

LinkedInX
EW

European Women Lawyers Association

· · filed 26 Jan 2023 · source

Feedback: European Womens Lawyers Association, Laura Carlson The European Womens Lawyers Association (EWLA) applauds the proposal by the Commission with respect to creating binding standards for member states equality bodies, consequently fostering greater access to justice for individuals affected by discrimination.

LinkedInX
DN

Diputación de Barcelona, Oficina de Políticas de Igualdad

· · filed 25 Jan 2023 · source

The Diputación de Barcelona is a local government institution that promotes the progress and well-being of citizens in its territorial area: Barcelona province 311 networked municipalities, representing 74.4 % of the total Catalan population (more than 5.5 million people).

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GC

GMVV & Co. GmbH Think Tank

· · filed 14 Dec 2022 · source

EU-Consultation GMVV & Co. GmbH Think Tank: Binding Standards for Equality Bodies The GMVV & Co. GmbH Think Tank welcomes the initiative to create binding standards for equality bodies. A particular focus here is on creating an equality and non-discriminatory reality in the EU labor market. Within the European Union, there is still a significant regulatory gap between socio-political issues and economic policy.

LinkedInX
SL

Svobodní lidé

· · filed 9 Dec 2022 · source

We do not need more and more laws! What you do with our governments sold is crime and genocide. To destroy traditional families and values, you are struggling with different susceptibility, sexual deviants, paedophilia, torture, cannibalism and satanism, and you are trying to make it the norm. You bought a mains media that harass your lies, burst and manipulate on a daily basis.

Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EC

Equality Commission for Northern Ireland

· · filed 20 Aug 2021 · source

The Equality Commission for Northern Ireland welcomes and supports the European Commission’s commitment to developing binding standards to strengthen equality bodies in Europe, building on its work to date. There is a clear need for ambitious legislation to ensure equality bodies are equipped to fulfil the range of functions necessary to secure greater equality for all.

LinkedInX
VO

Vlaamse Overheid - Agentschap Binnenlands Bestuur

· · filed 20 Aug 2021 · source

The protection of fundamental rights, including the right to equal treatment, is not a matter of competence in the Belgian Federal State in itself, but an ancillary competence which must be linked to the principal powers. In other words, the authority competent to regulate a particular matter is the authority competent to combat discrimination in that area.

Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EE

Equinet - European Network of Equality Bodies

· · filed 19 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Equinet welcomes that, as announced in the EU Anti-racism Action Plan, the LGBTIQ Equality Strategy, the Disability Strategy and the EU Roma Strategic Framework for Equality, Inclusion and Participation, the Commission intends to present legislation to strengthen the role and independence of equality bodies.

LinkedInX
U

Unia

· · filed 19 Aug 2021 · source

PDF

Contribution by Unia (Equality Body and INDH — Belgium) — will be available in English later Unia supported the work of Equinet unreservedly and urged the Commission to refer to it in the preparation of the new instrument.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
OO

Even though Georgia is not a Member State of the EU, the Office of the Public Defender (Ombudsman) of Georgia (which exercises the powers of Anti-Discrimination Mechanism through Equality Department) considers it useful to share its reflections on the roadmap as an EQUINET member. Equality Department finds it particularly important that the standards address the equality bodies’ mandate: grounds and fields.

LinkedInX
FA

Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency

· · filed 13 Aug 2021 · source

The Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency welcomes the roadmap. The Agency fully agrees with its problem definition. Germany has not taken tangible measures to implement the 2018 Recommendation, even though FADA has pointed out a range of possible areas of improvement to the Federal Government.

LinkedInX
AO

Austrian Ombud for Equal Treatment

· · filed 12 Aug 2021 · source

The Austrian Ombud for Equal Treatment welcomes the Commissions initiative for binding standards for equality bodies. The Austrian Ombud is convinced that strengthening equality bodies through the areas identified in subsection B is key to making equality and non-discrimination a reality for all EU citizens.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 27 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.