AREV congratulates the Commission on its collaborative work. The unprecedented crisis that is shaking the wine industry to its core calls for structural measures. AREV hopes that this wine package will mark the beginning of a new era for European wine production.
2025/0071(COD) · In Force
Amending Regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products
19 submissions from 19 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 23 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 19 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
- Publication in the Official Journal · 14 Apr 2026
- Publication in the Official Journal · 13 Apr 2026
- Publication in the Official Journal · 12 Apr 2026
- Publication in the Official Journal · 11 Apr 2026
- Publication in the Official Journal · 10 Apr 2026
Who showed up
11 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3.7 industry submissions for every one from civil society.
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
What the room declares
- 10 of 19
- in the EU Register
- 42
- full-time lobbying staff
- €3.9M+
- declared costs a year
- 59
- EP accreditations declared
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 2 Jun 2025 — it ran from 7 Apr 2025.
- Policy area
- Agriculture (DG AGRI)
- Where it stands
- Awaiting adoption
- Legislative stage
- In Force
- Lead committee
- AGRI
- Rapporteur
- Esther Herranz García (EPP)
- Procedure
- 2025/0071(COD)
- Commission reference
- COM(2025)137
How it got here
- Proposal for a regulation2 Jun 2025
19 positions
(1) we welcome the proposal to extend the validity of replanting authorisations to 8 years, as we wish to support winegrowers who may have to dilate in view of the various uncertainties facing the sector. We also welcome the decision to remove penalties for cases where authorisation times could not be respected and the possibility of planting should be waived.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
DigitalTrade4.EU supports the proposals goalsenhancing competitiveness, managing climate risks, and meeting consumer demandsand advocates for integrating digital tools and sustainability practices to achieve them.
FIVS acknowledges the announcement of the EU Wine Package, which outlines policy recommendations aimed at helping the EU wine sector address todays pressing social, economic, geopolitical, and environmental challenges. We strongly support that the European Commission be empowered to establish a harmonised system for the identification of QR codes that link to electronic labels (e-labels).
Thank you for the opportunity to comment, which we are pleased to take up together with our partner association, the German Federal Association of Wine and Spirits (BWSI) here and more detailed in the document attached: Article 1 Amendments to Regulation (EU) No. 1308/2013 Point 5(b) and Point 9: The inclusion of the terms "alcohol-free" and "alcohol-light" is welcomed.
European Cancer Organisation
· · filed 2 Jun 2025 · source
The European Cancer Organisation (ECO), representing a wide network of professional societies, patient organisations and experts across Europes cancer community, welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the European Commission consultation on its proposed Wine Package. ECO stresses the importance of consumer awareness regarding the health risks of alcohol, including its established role as a carcinogen.
Région Grand Est
· · filed 2 Jun 2025 · source
The vineyards of the Grand Est are generally satisfied with the proposals of the High Level Group. However, the Region makes the following recommendations: Planting/replanting rights The vineyards are in favour of extending the lifetime of replanting authorisations from 3 to 8 years.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
CEEV - Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins
· · filed 2 Jun 2025 · source
We welcome the willingness of the European Commission to materialize its support to the wine sector by translating the policy recommendations adopted by the High-Level Group on wine last December into a concrete proposal aimed at helping the EU wine sector to address the serious challenges it is facing and to become more competitive.
Cooperativas Agro-alimentarias de España
· · filed 2 Jun 2025 · source
Spain’s Agro-Food Cooperatives generally welcomes the proposal of 28 March amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2021/2115 and (EU) No 251/2014 as regards certain market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and aromatised wine products. We then put forward some changes that would improve the proposal and we attach the assessment of this organisation in a broader document.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The Spanish Union of Farmers’ Unions has presented its critical and constructive assessment of the proposal for a Regulation on the wine package in the context of the European Commission’s public consultation. While acknowledging the Commission’s effort to address the crisis in the sector, it considers that the proposed reforms are insufficient and calls for a more ambitious structural review of the European wine…
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
We welcome the short-term implementation of the results of the High Level Group (HLG) and call for their timely implementation to support the sector. Essential elements of the draft must therefore be considered, although not yet sufficient. In particular, in addition to the attached opinion, it is essential to include two other amendments: 1.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
EuroCommerce appreciates the European Commission's proposal for targeted measures in the wine sector, amending Regulations No. 1308/2013, 2021/2115, and 251/2014. We recognise the importance of adapting the regulatory framework to evolving consumer preferences and market trends, particularly concerning low- and no-alcohol products, aromatised wines, and digital labelling.
Department of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries, and Food of the Government of Catalonia
· · filed 30 May 2025 · source
The Generalitat de Catalunya and INCAVI expressed their full support for the amendments proposed by the European Commission. However, they consider it appropriate to propose the following amendments to the reform proposal: Labelling: The term ‘light alcohol’ proposed by the European Commission for partially de-alcoholised wines should be replaced by that of low-alcohol wines.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Instituto Nacional de Vitivinicultura
· · filed 29 May 2025 · source
Comments on the proposal: — Article 1 (5) amends Article 119(1) of Regulation 1308/2013 to allow the use of terms linked to products which have undergone total or partial de-alcoholisation. Currently, de-alcoholised wine and partially de-alcoholised wine are not product categories within the meaning of Annex VII, Part II, but the oenological practice is authorised.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Chambres d'agriculture France
· · filed 28 May 2025 · source
French Chambers of Agriculture thank the Commission for this proposal, which aims to support the wine sector that is undergoing a period of major crisis. This package of measures directly reflects the recommendations of the High Level Group on Wine Policy, which is a good development. The crisis measures (green harvesting and distillation) introduced are short-term solutions that meet the challenges of the sector.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Anora Group Plc
· · filed 28 May 2025 · source
Madam/Sir, We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the European Commissions initiative regarding Wine package - the implementation of the recommendations of the High-Level Group on Wine Policy. Anora Group Plc welcomes the proposed changes to open up the possibility of using de-alcoholised wine for Aromatised wine products.
Copa and Cogeca welcome the Commissions legislative proposal on the so-called Wine Package and recognise it as a timely opportunity to support the EU wine sector during a period of structural crisis and market uncertainty.
Legacoop Agroalimentare
· · filed 12 May 2025 · source
It is very positive that the Commission pays attention to the complex situation of a sector of fundamental importance for European agricultural economics. However, precisely because of this situation, in order to make the measures more effective, some additional openings should be made.
Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission
Servicio de Seguimiento de la PAC - Junta de Andalucía
· · filed 14 Apr 2025 · source
With regard to the legislative proposals adopted by the European Commission on the Wine Legislative Package, the following considerations are made by the CAP Monitoring Service of the Regional Government of Andalusia: — We generally agree on the content of the Commission proposal as it introduces numerous flexibilities to limit overproduction through replanting authorisations and authorisations for new plantings…
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.