Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2022/0303(COD) · Lapsed / Withdrawn

Adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive)

35 submissions from 34 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 362 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 35 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee JURIRapporteur Axel Voss (EPP)
  1. Withdrawal by Commission · 6 Oct 2025
  2. Committee Opinion Adopted · 20 May 2025
  3. Committee Opinion Tabled · 29 Jan 2025
  4. Referred to Committee · 13 Nov 2024
  5. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 14 Nov 2023

Who showed up

23 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 9 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 23Civil society 9Public authorities, academia, other 3

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

25 of 34
in the EU Register
132
full-time lobbying staff
€23.3M+
declared costs a year
84
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 28 Nov 2022 — it ran from 3 Oct 2022.

Policy area
Justice (DG JUST)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Lapsed / Withdrawn
Lead committee
JURI
Rapporteur
Axel Voss (EPP)
Commission reference
COM(2022)496

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep28 Jul 2021
  2. Public consultation10 Jan 2022
  3. Prop dir28 Nov 2022

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 25 of 35 submissions.

U

Upwork

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

Upwork welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed AI Liability Directive and to engage constructively with the EU institutions going forward. At Upwork, we believe that, together with the proposed AI Act, the AI Liability Directive will both shape the future of Europes digital transition and set a benchmark for AI liability regimes in other jurisdictions.

LinkedInX
AF

Avaaz Foundation

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

Avaaz welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on Liability rules for Artificial Intelligence - The Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD). Artificial Intelligence (AI) is ubiquitous, whether we realise it or not.

LinkedInX
LC

Lyon Catholic University - UCLy

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

The views expressed are mine and not those of my employer. The holistic approach taken by the EU legislator in addressing the digital revolution and especially AI is welcome. Regarding more particularly the AI Liability Directive, here below are a few comments.

LinkedInX
EE

EYBA - European Young Bar Association

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

The European Young Bar Association (hereinafter EYBA or the Association) strongly supports the Authorities to embrace a regulation on AI systems and to approach it in a way that its balanced: facing the risks of a detrimental impact on human rights and democracy and at the same time taking into consideration the technology and its development.

LinkedInX
TM

The Mozilla Foundation

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

It has been well established that AI can harm people in various ways, from physical harm caused by faulty machinery to algorithmic discrimination caused by bias datasets. It is therefore all the more important to ensure that people have access to effective redress where they have been harmed by AI systems.

LinkedInX
S

SMEunited

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

SMEunited welcomes the aim to provide more clarity and legal security for businesses engaging with AI in EU Member States and especially for businesses trading across borders. Bringing minimum levels of protection is appropriate but must take into account the size and resources of the different economic actors.

LinkedInX
WI

Women in AI Austria

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

Women in AI Austria welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed AI Liability Directive. We commend the work of the European Commission in developing a framework for artificial intelligence and algorithmic systems. However, we would like to highlight some aspects which could merit further attention, and hope our feedback - submitted as a PDF - contributes to the further refinement of the proposed provisions.

LinkedInX
TI

TomTom International B.V.

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

Considering the parallel cross-sectorial legislative proposal on liability (the revision of the product liability directive from 1985) and the potential overlap between these two pieces of legislation, TomTom would like to submit detailed comments on both files simultaneously during the PLD consultation (closing on 9th December 2022).

LinkedInX
AL

Ada Lovelace Institute

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The Ada Lovelace Institute (Ada) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD). The AILD is a central component of the EUs regulatory framework for AI as adequate ex post protections for harmed persons are a pre-requisite for society trusting in emerging technology.

LinkedInX
M

MEDEF

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

In a context of international sovereignty and competitiveness where the development of European technological and digital infrastructures has become indispensable, it is crucial to build a European ecosystem of trust that respects both European values and innovation and artificial intelligence (AI), so that citizens and businesses can benefit from cutting-edge technologies.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FA

France Assureurs - Fédération Française de l'Assurance

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

If France Assureurs considered that the current civil liability framework was fit for purpose in addressing the changes of new technologies and in particular to AI, it is essential to ensure a harmonisation of the rules at a European level.

LinkedInX
LP

LA POSTE

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

Digital is a priority axis of the strategic plan “La Poste 2030, committed to you”. To support the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data, La Poste has a framework to ensure an ethical, responsible and human approach to AI, consistent with the group’s historical values.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
E

EFPIA

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) represents the biopharmaceutical industry operating in Europe. Through its direct membership of 37 national associations, 38 leading pharmaceutical companies and a growing number of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), EFPIAs mission is to create a collaborative environment that enables our members to innovate, discover, develop and…

LinkedInX
IC

Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL)

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) is Irelands oldest independent human rights monitoring organisation. We welcome the opportunity to respond to the consultation on the Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD). The AILD attempts to address the problems posed by artificial intelligence (AI) systems to the liability rules in the European Union (EU).

LinkedInX
BE

Bitkom e.V.

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

In principle, Bitkom welcomes the fact that the draft AI Liability Directive aims to regulate the first fundamental questions of liability in the event of damage arising from the use of AI. However, we believe that additional liability rules in this form would not have been necessary. Rather, they could have a negative impact on the application and further development of AI technologies.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
FO

Future of Life Institute

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The Future of Life Institute (FLI) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the European Commission on its proposal for an artificial intelligence (AI) Liability Directive. Liability is an important instrument for safeguarding the interests of society.

LinkedInX
Z

ZVEI

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

With reference to our statement from July 2021 on the Inception Impact Assessment and our position paper "Liability for AI" from May 2021 submitted in this context, we maintain the position that, in view of the existing technology-neutral and comprehensively applicable product safety and liability law, there are no relevant liability gaps for potential damage caused by AI applications and systems and thus no need…

LinkedInX
EA

European Association of Co-operative Banks

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The European Association of Co-operative Banks (EACB) welcomes the possibility to contribute to the discussion on the proposal for a Directive on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (the AI Liability Directive). Please find our position on this proposal in the attached document.

LinkedInX
TG

The German Banking Industry Committe (Die Deutsche Kreditwirtschaft)

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The German Banking Industry Committe (Die Deutsche Kreditwirtschaft) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the European Commissions inception impact assessment on adapting liability rules to the digital age and artificial intelligence. Please find our detailed position on this initiative in the attached document.

LinkedInX
CI

CSC - IT Center for Science

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

Emerging technologies, such as AI, are important drivers of Europes future competitiveness and wellbeing of citizens. In order to ensure that Europe will be at the forefront of technological development, the EU must create a coherent and enabling regulatory framework for the development of European AI technologies and applications, keeping in mind what the EU aims to achieve with new technologies in general.

LinkedInX
ME

MedTech Europe

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

MedTech Europe is the European association of medical technology manufacturers, including digital health products that fall under the scope of our sectoral regulations, some of which would fall under the scope of the proposed Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD).

LinkedInX
AH

APPLiA (Home Appliance Europe)

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

APPLiA (Home Appliance Europe) acknowledges the European Commissions proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence (AI Liability Directive).

LinkedInX
S

SIEMENS

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

We welcome the ALD (AI Liability Directive) as being a directive and not a Regulation leaving the details of the liability regime to the Member States We also welcome the proposed fault-based regime (and that the EC does not entertain previous attempts to introduce strict liability for AI). We would prefer that the ALD set this principle as a standard to avoid fragmentation among the Member States.

LinkedInX
JE

Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

We apologize for the inconvenience, but please replace the feedback reference number F3362012 uploaded on 27 November 2022 with the following. The Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association (JEITA) is Japans leading ICT association, with around 400 members from Japan and abroad and a Europe office in Brussels.

LinkedInX
CI

Czech Insurtech Association

· · filed 28 Nov 2022 · source

PDF

The Czech Insurtech Association would like to express gratitude for the Proposal on the Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive (AILD), which is the horizontal regulation with an impact on certain technology without consideration of sector specificities.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 35 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.