It has been well established that AI can harm people in various ways, from physical harm caused by faulty machinery to algorithmic discrimination caused by bias datasets. It is therefore all the more important to ensure that people have access to effective redress where they have been harmed by AI systems.
The Mozilla Foundation
NGO · United States · EU Transparency Register 133978448647-87
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 964 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #559 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- The Mozilla Foundation is partner of of the European AI & Society Fund, which works to ensure that civil society is a…
- https://europeanaifund.org/our-partners/
- Mozilla Foundation supports the Coalition for Independent Technology Research
- a coalition of academics
- journalists
- civil society researchers
- and community scientists that works to advance
- defend
- and sustain the right to study the impact of technology on society.
- https://independenttechresearch.org/members/
- Mozilla Foundation is a member of the Green Screen Coalition, a group of funders and practitioners looking to build b…
- https://greenscreen.network/en/about/
- and 1 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Registered as
- Mozilla Foundation
- Head office
- San Francisco, United states
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track The in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at The Mozilla Foundation? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
The Mozilla Foundation filed 2 positions between 28 Nov 2022 and 2 Jun 2023, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
The Digital Services Act is poised to shape the platform auditing ecosystem for years to come, in the EU and beyond. This is therefore a critical window within which to foster a trusted and healthy auditing ecosystem, and to ensure the functioning of this key compliance measure. In our attached recommendations we encourage the European Commission to: 1.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put The Mozilla Foundation next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from The Mozilla Foundation’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.