Uniper SE greatly appreciates the opportunity to comment on the European Commissions (EC) Proposal for amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 as regards enhancing the usability of the Technical Screening Criteria (TSC). Please find our full reply attached. Best regards, [name removed], on behalf of Uniper SE
US
Uniper SE
Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 285977820662-03
5
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
5
legislative files
of 326 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #165 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
5.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€900K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
3
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since
Declares membership of
- EURELECTRIC (via national electricity associations)
- Eurogas →
- Hydrogen Europe →
- BusinessEurope →
- Energy Storage Europe →
- Energy Traders Europe →
- GIE/GSE
- IETA
- EEF
- Nuclear Europe (via national nuclear associations)
- SolarPower Europe →
- WindEurope →
- and 4 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- Uniper
- Head office
- Düsseldorf, Germany
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Uniper in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Uniper SE? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Uniper SE filed 5 positions between 20 Mar 2026 and 25 Aug 2026, across 5 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
Please find attached the position of Uniper on the use of International Carbon Credits under the EU Climate Law: Key Messages: 1. Uniper supports a cautious and welldesigned use of international carbon credits as a complementary instrument to domestic decarbonisation, helping to balance climate ambition, competitiveness and affordability. 2.
Uniper welcomes the opportunity to respond to the public consultation on the European Commissions proposal for a revision of the EU Network Code on requirements for grid connection of generators (RfG 2.0). Our detailed response is provided in the attachment.
Uniper welcomes the opportunity to provide a response to the public consultation on the European Commissions proposal for a delegated regulation as regards a common EU scheme for rating the sustainability of data centres in Europe. Our detailed response is provided in the attachment.
We represent a European asset-backed energy trading firm, active on the wholesale electricity and natural gas markets. Like many firms with a similar business profile, we are an active participant in the commodity derivatives market, which are instrumental in reducing the risks associated with our business.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- IDEE ECONOMICHE www.idee-economiche.it · 4 files in common
- RWE AG · 4 files in common
- Statkraft · 4 files in common
- EDP SA · 4 files in common
- EDF - Electricité de France · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 57.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Uniper SE’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.