Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
UMI

Umicore

Company · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 78662404191-38

8
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
8
legislative files
of 326 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #65 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

7
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€900K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2010
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • BEPA - The Batteries European Partnership Association European Metals
  • AGORIA – Belgian Federation for the Technology Industry
  • ERT - European Roundtable of Industrialists
  • AECC - Association for Emission Control by Catalyst
  • RECHARGE - Association of Portable Rechargeable Batteries
  • EBRA - European Battery Recycling Association
  • IAM-I - The Innovative Advanced Materials Initiative
  • EuMaT - European Technology Platform for Advanced Engineering Materials and Technologies
  • EERA - European Electronics Recyclers Association
  • International Platinum Group Metals Association
  • Global Battery Alliance
  • European Precious Metals Federation
  • and 3 more

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Brussels, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Umicore in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Umicore? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Umicore engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 8 files, from Umicore or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Umicore filed 8 positions between 18 May 2024 and 23 Jul 2026, across 8 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.

2024 · 1 filed2025 · 3 filed2026 · 4 filed

What they argued

Circular Economy Actfiled 5 Nov 2025PDFsource

Key Policy Recommendations for a Circular Economy in non-ferrous Metals & CRMs. To unlock the full potential of non-ferrous metals and critical raw materials in the EUs circular economy, we need smart, targeted policies: 1) Tailor approaches, no one-size-fits-all 2) Use KPIs that reward strategic recovery 3) Build a true single market for waste 4) Focus on quality recycling, not mandatory content quotas 5) Ensure…

EU taxonomy - Review of the environmental delegated actfiled 14 Apr 2026source

We welcome the amendments to economic activity 2.4 Treatment of hazardous waste, notably the removal of the exclusion for metals and metal compounds and the explicit reference to NACE code C24.4. These changes appropriately recognise the strategic role of metals recycling in achieving EU circular economy objectives and securing the supply of secondary raw materials.

EU taxonomy - review of the climate delegated actfiled 14 Apr 2026source

Umicore does not support the separation of battery manufacturing and battery recycling into distinct EU Taxonomy activities. A closed-loop, value chain approach is essential. The EU Battery Regulation is based on a life cycle logic, with binding obligations applying to batteries placed on the EU market as a whole, including recycling and recovery targets.

EU Critical Raw Materials Centrefiled 23 Jul 2026PDFsource

Europe needs a Critical Raw Materials Centrebut its focus should go beyond joint purchasing and stockpiling. The CRM Centre should primarily strengthen Europe's refining, transformation and recycling capacities, while avoiding unintended distortions of raw material markets.

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 18 May 2024source

The draft text for the delegated act on calculating the carbon footprint of batteries requires the use of the national average energy mix. This is not in line with the Product Environmental Footprint method, which the Battery Regulation referred to, and deviates from several European legislation. Further it contains in itself an inconsistency with regards to electricity modelling.

Commission Implementing Regulation on the list for the purposes of Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1252filed 14 Jul 2025PDFsource

Umicore welcomes the proposed implementing act as a solid foundation but highlights several key areas for improvement to ensure effective and harmonised CRM recovery across the EU. 1. Need for Coordinated Implementation CRM use is highly dispersed across sectors. Without EU-wide coordination, national initiatives risk fragmentation and inefficiency. Economies of scale are essential for viable CRM recycling. 2.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 355.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Umicore’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.