RUCODEM comments on several aspects of the legislative proposals on the establishment of a CDPC and on the re-attribution of scientific and technical work to ECHA regarding: Definitions - some need to be clarified: definition of environmental sustainability related data (too broad and is not clear to which information it refers to); definition of chemicals data; the definitions of duty holder and business operators…
RUC
RUCODEM
Industry association · Romania · EU Transparency Register 477429147901-47
3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1205 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #577 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2022
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Member of
- Detergents Europe www.detergentseurope.eu
- Cosmetics Europe www.cosmeticseurope.eu
- ASRO TC www.asro.ro
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Trade and business associations
- Registered as
- RUCODEM - Romanian Union of Cosmetics and Detergents Manufacturers (RUCODEM)
- Head office
- Bucharest, Romania
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track RUCODEM in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at RUCODEM? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
RUCODEM filed 3 positions between 10 Oct 2022 and 20 Aug 2024, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
2022 · 1 filed2024 · 2 filed
What they argued
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with our comments, that focus on how the future regulation should integrate the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (“SCCS”) within ECHA. Namely: - any re-allocation of the work of the SCCS to ECHA should keep the specific and unique excellent expertise that the SCCS has gained since over than 40 years with regards to safety of cosmetic ingredients and products.
We appreciate the launch of the public consultation and the opportunity to present our point of view on the regulations that are applicable in the area of explosive precursors with view to reducing the administrative burden and strengthen even more the safety. Regarding Option 2, we support it, as it is focused on strengthening awareness-raising and research.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- Cefic · 2 files in common
- Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · 2 files in common
- European Environmental Bureau · 2 files in common
- Japan Business Council in Europe · 2 files in common
- German Association of Biotechnology Industries (DIB) within the German Chemical Industry Association - VCI · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 22.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from RUCODEM’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.