Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Revision of the EU explosives precursors legislation

11 submissions from 11 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 237 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 11 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

7 submissions from industry and none from civil society organizations; 4 from public authorities, academia and others.

Industry 7Civil society 0Public authorities, academia, other 4

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 23 Jun 2025 — it ran from 31 Mar 2025.

Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Sept 2026 · in 31 days

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment20 Aug 2024
  2. Public consultation23 Jun 2025

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Proposal for a regulation.

11 positions

FE

Fertilizers Europe

· · filed 20 Aug 2024 · source

PDF

Fertilizers Europe takes security related potential threats of chemicals misuses very seriously and did welcome EU 2019/1148 Regulation. The above is also reflected in security being an integral part of Fertilizers Europe Product Stewardship program, that is mandatorily adopted by its members.

LinkedInX
BD

Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat

· · filed 20 Aug 2024 · source

We see considerable difficulties with the implementation in Germany in the event that high-risk chemicals are included in Regulation (EU) 2019/1148, since there are different responsibilities in Germany at both federal and state level involved.

LinkedInX
AI

A.I.S.E.

· · filed 20 Aug 2024 · source

PDF

A.I.S.E., the voice of the detergents, cleaning and maintenance products industry in Europe, thanks the Commission for the possibility to provide input to the call for evidence on the evaluation of Regulation (EU) 2019/1148. A.I.S.E.

LinkedInX
R

RUCODEM

· · filed 20 Aug 2024 · source

We appreciate the launch of the public consultation and the opportunity to present our point of view on the regulations that are applicable in the area of explosive precursors with view to reducing the administrative burden and strengthen even more the safety. Regarding Option 2, we support it, as it is focused on strengthening awareness-raising and research.

LinkedInX

Regulation (EU) 2019/118, in its current wording, offers the possibility of choosing between two schemes and thus allows each EU country to adopt rules adapted not only to its specific needs but also to its specific physical, demographic, economic, agricultural and industrial characteristics. France, like the majority of the Member States of the European Union, has opted for registration.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
VD

Verband der Chemischen Industrie e.V. - VCI

· · filed 19 Aug 2024 · source

PDF

The objective of Regulation (EU) 2019/1148 is to limit the access of members of the general public to explosives precursors. The aim is to prevent criminal actors from acquiring these substances in order to produce explosives and to use them for attacks. The VCI supports the Commission’s objective of countering and minimising the threat of terrorist attacks involving chemicals.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
DD

DAKOFO (Danish Grain & Feed Association)

· · filed 15 Aug 2024 · source

As the representative body for the Danish trade in fertilizers for agricultural purposes, DAKOFO fully understands and supports the objectives of EU Regulation 2019/1148, particularly the need to prevent the misuse of certain chemicals. However, we have significant concerns regarding the substantial administrative burdens that this regulation imposes on both farmers and trading companies.

LinkedInX
ST

SMark Technology Zrt.

· · filed 14 Aug 2024 · source

It is appropriate to revise the Precursors Regulation as follows: Call for Evidence "Option 2: Increase awareness and research This option could include a number of measures, such as: raising awareness among authorities, including law enforcement authorities and all parties involved in the supply chain, of the need to monitor not only chemicals covered by the Regulation, but also certain alternative chemicals; and…

Filed in Hungarian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
P

Police

· · filed 14 Aug 2024 · source

We assesses the need to update the rules for the marketing and use of explosive precursors as an essential step in increasing security and public safety. The regulation plays a very important role in preventing the misuse of these substances for the illicit manufacture of explosives.

LinkedInX
E

Ecolab

· · filed 5 Aug 2024 · source

While, as economic operators, we understand and share the objectives of the explosive precursors regulations, in particular the importance to avoid the misuse of certain chemicals, the regulation imposes an admin workload that is difficult to justify on the sales between economic operators.

LinkedInX
OP

Organisation professionnelle

· · filed 2 Aug 2024 · source

PDF

The aim of this contribution is to shed light on the French civil and defence pyrotechnic industry, represented by its Syndicat des Manufacturers DExplosives, de Pyrotechnie et dartifices (SFEPA www.sfepa.com). SFEPA’s analysis focused on the following points detailed in the remainder of this document: Study of the scope of the EU Regulation on the marketing and use of explosives precursors, with its difficulties…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 11 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.